The desire to expel unselfish members from the group.

@article{Parks2010TheDT,
  title={The desire to expel unselfish members from the group.},
  author={Craig D. Parks and Asako Brook Stone},
  journal={Journal of personality and social psychology},
  year={2010},
  volume={99 2},
  pages={
          303-10
        }
}
  • C. Parks, A. Stone
  • Published 2010
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Journal of personality and social psychology
An initial study investigating tolerance of group members who abuse a public good surprisingly showed that unselfish members (those who gave much toward the provision of the good but then used little of the good) were also targets for expulsion from the group. Two follow-up studies replicated this and ruled out explanations grounded in the target being seen as confused or unpredictable. A fourth study suggested that the target is seen by some as establishing an undesirable behavior standard and… Expand

Topics from this paper

Metanorms and antisocial punishment
Abstract Contributions to public goods benefit all group members, yet research shows that generous group members are sometimes punished. We argue that when such antisocial punishment efforts areExpand
A normative explanation of antisocial punishment.
TLDR
The effect of descriptive norms on sanctioning of generous and stingy deviants is examined and it is found that descriptive norms encourage antisocial punishment, but not punishment of free-riders. Expand
Nobody likes a rat: On the willingness to report lies and the consequences thereof
We investigate the intrinsic motivation of individuals to report, and thereby sanction, fellow group members who lie for personal gain. We further explore the changes in lying and reporting behaviorExpand
Do-gooder derogation in children: the social costs of generosity
TLDR
By middle childhood, coming up short in comparison with a peer can decrease one’s liking for a generous individual, and the effects of social comparison on their preferences are investigated. Expand
Too Good to be Liked? When and How Prosocial Others are Disliked
TLDR
Two mechanisms why devaluation of extreme prosocial individuals may occur are suggested: they may (a) constitute very high comparison standards for observers, and may (b) be perceived as communal narcissists. Expand
Prosocial behavior and reputation: When does doing good lead to looking good?
TLDR
Recent research on how people evaluate those who engage in prosocial behavior is reviewed and key factors that influence whether observers will praise or denigrate a prosocial actor for doing a good deed are identified. Expand
Moderators of the disapproval of peer punishment
Recent studies have found disapproval of peer punishment of norm violations. This seems puzzling, given the potential benefits peer punishers contribute to the group. We suggest part of the answer isExpand
Cooperation in social groups: reactions to (moral) deviants
The present dissertation examines the influence of self-involvement with perpetrators and victims on third-party reactions to deviants. Dealing with others’ social behaviors regulates social life andExpand
Reactions to morally motivated deviance
People value morality in themselves and others. They want to be moral and good individuals, associate themselves with others who share their moral values, and belong to moral groups. As an ironicExpand
When principled deviance becomes moral threat: Testing alternative mechanisms for the rejection of moral rebels
Monin, Sawyer, and Marquez (2008) demonstrated that a rebel who refused to participate in a racially prejudiced decision task was derogated by actors who had themselves taken part in the task, butExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
The rejection of moral rebels: resenting those who do the right thing.
TLDR
Four studies suggest that rebels are resented when their implicit reproach threatens the positive self-image of individuals who did not rebel. Expand
The perils of outperformance: sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison.
TLDR
The framework of a major form of outperformance-related distress, which is label sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison (STTUC), unites many previously disconnected findings on topics such as fear of success, envy, self-presentation, and self-evaluation maintenance. Expand
Shifting social identities as a strategy for deflecting threatening social comparisons.
TLDR
Results of three studies suggest that the multifaceted nature of identity provides a strategic basis for reducing the threat involved in upward social comparisons and that use of the strategy was associated with relatively more positive affect following threatening upward comparisons. Expand
Reactions of would-be helpers whose offer of help is spurned.
TLDR
An experiment was conducted to test the proposition that rejection of help by a needy recipient constitutes a negative expectancy violation for the would-be helper, and dispositionally high expectations of interpersonal success served to amplify helpers' reactions to rejection/acceptance. Expand
Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis
Theory developed to account for behavior in social dilemmas—situations in which - the rational pursuit of self-interest can lead to collective disaster—was applied to the analysis of groupExpand
Ostracism increases social susceptibility
Ostracism, the act of ignoring and excluding, is a universally applied tactic of social control. Individuals who detect ostracism often change their behaviors to be readmitted into the group, even ifExpand
"Judgable" people: personality, behavior, and competing explanations.
Judgability" discriminates people who are open and knowable from those who are closed and enigmatic. The current study investigated this individual difference characteristic and its personality andExpand
Collective self-esteem as a moderator of the frog-pond effect in reactions to performance feedback.
Individuals who perform well within an unsuccessful group have more favorable reactions than equally capable individuals who perform poorly within a successful group. This frog-pond effect appears toExpand
Anti-Norm and Pro-Norm Deviance in the Bank and on the Campus: Two Experiments on Subjective Group Dynamics
In two experiments, participants evaluated other individuals who deviated in either an anti-or pro-normative direction relative to normative members of the same group. We predicted that individualsExpand
The Effects of Envy on Reciprocation in a Social Dilemma
This article presents two studies that address Axelrod’s (1984) prescription to not worry about the outcomes that others receive in a mixed-motive situation. The first study demonstrated that peopleExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...