The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups

  title={The conflict of harmony: Intergroup contact, commonality and political solidarity between minority groups},
  author={Demis E. Glasford and Justine Calcagno},
  journal={Journal of Experimental Social Psychology},

Figures from this paper

Fostering social change among advantaged and disadvantaged group members: Integrating intergroup contact and social identity perspectives on collective action
Recent research on intergroup contact has shown how interactions with outgroup members may both decrease and increase motivations to achieve social equality. Similarly, social identity theory has
Contact, Political Solidarity and Collective Action: An Indian Case Study of Relations between Historically Disadvantaged Communities
Research on the contact hypothesis has highlighted the role of contact in improving intergroup relations. Most of this research has addressed the problem of transforming the prejudices of
Emerging research on intergroup prosociality: Group members' charitable giving, positive contact, allyship, and solidarity with others
This paper describes an emerging body of work on intergroup prosociality, drawing together parallel literatures and highlighting some of the themes of the recent research. A broad distinction between
“If We Become Friends, Maybe I Can Change My Perspective: ” Intergroup Contact, Endorsement of Conflict Narratives, and Peace-Related Attitudes in Turkey
Positive intergroup contact is effective in reducing prejudice in both high- and low-status groups. However, it is important to study the impact of contact between groups in conflict-ridden societies
Stigma-Based Solidarity
With growing diversity and increased media attention to inequality, it is likely that stigmatized-group members will have increased political influence on social issues affecting other stigmatized
Supportive Contact and LGBT Collective Action: The Moderating Role of Membership in Specific Groups
A growing body of literature suggests that positive cross-group contact between members of advantaged and disadvantaged groups can undermine disadvantaged group members’ collective action engagement.
Respect the technique: Status-based respect increases minority group social cohesion with majority groups, while also increasing minority collective action tendencies
It is suggested that social-cohesion strategies rooted in status-based respect may allow for social cohesion and collective action in the face of social change.
Asian Americans’ Perception of Intergroup Commonality with Blacks and Latinos: The Roles of Group Consciousness, Ethnic Identity, and Intergroup Contact
Results from ordered logistic regression analyses suggest that group consciousness, ethnic identity, and intergroup contact via friendship are robust predictors of Asian Americans’ feelings of closeness to Blacks and Latinos.


The Irony of Harmony
It is proposed that beyond improving attitudes toward the out-group, positive contact affects disadvantaged-group members' perceptions of intergroup inequality in ways that can undermine their support for social change toward equality.
The Political Solidarity Model of Social Change: Dynamics of Self-Categorization in Intergroup Power Relations
  • Emina SubasicK. ReynoldsJ. Turner
  • Sociology
    Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
  • 2008
It is argued that political solidarity as a social change process involves a contest between the authority and the minority over the meaning of a shared (higher order) identity with the majority.
Beyond Contact: Intergroup Contact in the Context of Power Relations
Members of advantaged groups generally preferred to talk about commonalities between the groups more than about group-based power, and this desire was greater with higher levels of identification, but perceiving that their group's advantage was illegitimate increased the desire ofadvantaged group members to address power in intergroup interactions.
Politicized collective identity. A social psychological analysis.
It is proposed that people evince politicized collective identity to the extent that they engage as self-conscious group members in a power struggle on behalf of their group knowing that it is the more inclusive societal context in which this struggle has to be fought out.
Subgroup Relations: A Comparison of Mutual Intergroup Differentiation and Common Ingroup Identity Models of Prejudice Reduction
Two studies examined relations between groups (humanities and math-science students) that implicitly or explicitly share a common superordinate category (university student). In Experiment 1, 178
“Let Them Eat Harmony”
Research on intergroup prejudice has generally adopted a model of social change that is based around the psychological rehabilitation of members of advantaged groups in order to foster intergroup
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
The meta-analysis finds that intergroup contact typically reduces intergroup prejudice, and this result suggests that contact theory, devised originally for racial and ethnic encounters, can be extended to other groups.
Framing interethnic ideology: effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals.
The findings lead us to question the implicit assumption driving the majority of social psychological efforts at prejudice reduction: that the categorization process leads to prejudice, and that the relevance of social categories must therefore be de-emphasized.
A paradox of integration? Interracial contact, prejudice reduction and perceptions of racial discrimination
A Random Digit Dialing survey (n=596) investigated the relationship between quantity and quality of interracial contact and black South Africans’ perceptions of racial discrimination in
Transforming “Apathy Into Movement”:The Role of Prosocial Emotions in Motivating Action for Social Change
The authors conclude that the most “effective” emotion will depend on the context of the inequality but that outrage seems particularly likely to productively shape group processes and social change outcomes.