The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words

  title={The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words},
  author={Stasa Milojevic and Cassidy R. Sugimoto and Erjia Yan and Ying Ding},
  journal={Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology},
This study comprises a suite of analyses of words in article titles in order to reveal the cognitive structure of Library and Information Science (LIS. [] Key Result Conceptually, our analysis reveals that LIS consists of three main branches: the traditionally recognized library-related and information-related branches, plus an equally distinct bibliometrics/scientometrics branch. The three branches focus on: libraries, information, and science, respectively. In addition, our study identifies substructures…

A lexical and syntactic study of research article titles in Library Science and Scientometrics

Title of a research article is an abstract of the abstract. Titles play a decisive role in convincing readers at first sight whether articles are worth reading or not. Not only do research article

Twenty-six years of LIS research focus and hot spots, 1990–2016: A co-word analysis

Analysis of the hot spots of the LIS research based on Kleinberg algorithm indicated that the words ‘Internet’ and ‘World Wide Web’ have attracted the most attention by LIS scholars during the years under study.

Topic Evolution of Library and Information Science Studies in the Last Twenty Years: A Co-Word Analysis

A strategic diagram to analyze the developments of the last twenty years of library and information science field was drawn and topic clusters were analyzed and information retrieval and bibliometrics were the most developed topics in the field.

Knowledge structure transition in library and information science: topic modeling and visualization

The purpose of this research is to identify topics in library and information science (LIS) using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and to visualize the knowledge structure of the field as consisting

A data-driven analysis of the knowledge structure of library science with full-text journal articles

The findings indicate that, during the past 20 years, library science has developed into an interdisciplinary knowledge structure that integrates librarianship topics with a range of other fields, generating major topics that include the academic library, the digital library, research methodology, library marketing, information retrieval, digital information, document citation, and so on.

Mapping the evolution of library and information science (1978–2014) using topic modeling on LISA

This paper offers an overview of the bibliometric study of the domain of library and information science (LIS), with the aim of giving a multidisciplinary perspective of the topical boundaries and

A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years

It is shown that, despite a striking growth in the number of journals, papers, and contributing authors, a decrease was observed in the field's market-share of all social science and humanities research.

The Context of Paratext : A Bibliometric Study of the Citation Contexts of Gérard Genette ’ s

This chapter presents the results, which show both close connections and similarities in citation patterns, namely, to literature studies and to the humanities in general.

LIS research across 50 years: content analysis of journal articles

PurposeThis paper analyses the research in Library and Information Science (LIS) and reports on (1) the status of LIS research in 2015 and (2) on the evolution of LIS research longitudinally from

Using the appearance of citations in full text on author co-citation analysis

This article catches several metadata in full text of citing papers but not aims at content-level information, which increases the amount of information input to ACA without increasing computational complexity a lot.



Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis: II: Dynamical aspects

Combined analysis of co-citation relations and words is explored to study time-dependent (“dynamical”) aspects of scientific activities, as expressed in research publications and reveals a change from more rapid succession of new empirical studies to more retrospective, and theoretically oriented studies in later years.

Creativity and Conformity in Science: Titles, Keywords and Co-word Analysis

Co-word analysis of both the keywords and the titles of a set of papers in `acidification research' is undertaken and the results are found to be comparable, though the keyword-derived results provide greater detail, suggesting that keyword indexing doest not, as has sometimes been claimed, distort coword findings.

Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis

Mapping of Science by Combined Co-Citation and Word Analysis. I. Structural Aspects

The claim that co-citation analysis is a useful tool to map subject-matter specialties of scientific research in a given period, is examined. A method has been developed using quantitative analysis

Towards mapping library and information science

The Evolution of Library and Information Science 1965-1985: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles

The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation

The findings indicate that the main topics in LIS have changed substantially from those in the initial period (1930–1969) to the present (2000–2009), including the diminishing use of the word library.

A connectionist and multivariate approach to science maps: the SOM, clustering and MDS applied to library and information science research

A domain analysis of the library and information science discipline based on author co-citation analysis and journal cocitation analysis is presented, which considers MDS, the SOM and clustering as complementary methods that provide representations of the same reality from different analytical points of view.


Chemistry and botany are found to have the highest values, followed by physics, medicine, history, and the social sciences, with philosophy lowest, and some difficulties of searching by title due to the vocabularies of non‐scientific subjects are discussed.