The clear speech effect for non-native listeners.

  title={The clear speech effect for non-native listeners.},
  author={Ann R. Bradlow and Tessa Bent},
  journal={The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
  volume={112 1},
Previous work has established that naturally produced clear speech is more intelligible than conversational speech for adult hearing-impaired listeners and normal-hearing listeners under degraded listening conditions. The major goal of the present study was to investigate the extent to which naturally produced clear speech is an effective intelligibility enhancement strategy for non-native listeners. Thirty-two non-native and 32 native listeners were presented with naturally produced English… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: intelligibility and accentedness.
The results provided strong evidence that greater experience in L2 processing leads to improved intelligibility in both production and perception domains and demonstrated that speaking style adaptations along with less signal distortion can contribute significantly towards successful native and non-native interactions.
The intelligibility of Lombard speech for non-native listeners.
The relatively small difference in Lombardbenefit in noise for native and non-native listeners, along with the absence of Lombard benefit in quiet, suggests that any contribution of linguistic enhancements in the Lombard Benefit for natives is small.
Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners.
Results suggest that native and non-native listeners apply similar strategies for speech-in-noise perception: the crucial difference is in the signal clarity required for contextual information to be effective, rather than in an inability of non- native listeners to take advantage of this contextual information per se.
Effects of noise, reverberation and foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' performance of English speech comprehension.
Investigation of the effects of background noise level, reverberation time, and talker foreign accent on native and non-native listeners' speech comprehension, while controlling for English language abilities shows that, while higher BNLs were generally more detrimental to listeners with lower English proficiency, all listeners experienced significant comprehension deficits above RC-40 with native English talkers.
The Effects of Modified Speech Styles on Intelligibility for Non-Native Listeners
While enhanced styles lead to gains by reducing the effect of masking noise, the same styles distort the acoustic-phonetic integrity of the speech signal, suggesting that more work is needed to develop speech modification approaches that simultaneously preserve speech information and promote unmasking.
Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
PURPOSE This study explored clear speech (CS) and noise-adapted speech (NAS) intelligibility benefits for native and nonnative English listeners. It also examined how the two speaking style
Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
Correlation analyses comparing acoustic and perceptual data indicated that a shift of energy concentration toward higher frequency regions and greater source strength contributed to the clear speech effect for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with simulated impairment.
Effects of reverberation and noise on speech comprehension by native and non-native English-speaking listeners
Previous studies have demonstrated the negative impact of adverse signal-to-noise-ratios on non-native English-speaking listeners’ performance on speech recognition using recall tasks, as well as
Clear speech intelligibility: Listener and talker effects
In this study, we investigated whether the intelligibility-enhancing mode of speech production, known as “clear speech” produced by native and non-native talkers influenced speech intelligibility
The present study addresses a core issue in the study of speech perception, the question of how stable phonological representations are accessed from an inherently variable speech signal. In


Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Two predictors of intelligibility are used to quantify the environmental degradations: the articulation index (AI) and the speech transmission index (STI).
Auditory and auditory-visual perception of clear and conversational speech.
  • K. Helfer
  • Psychology, Physics
    Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR
  • 1997
The results suggest that speaking clearly and providing visual speech information provide complementary (rather than redundant) information.
Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech.
Variations in the intelligibility of speech produced for hearing-impaired listeners under two conditions indicated that improvements in intelligibility occurred across all phoneme classes.
The Effect of Cue-Enhancement on Consonant Intelligibility in Noise: Speaker and Listener Effects
This study investigated the robustness of enhancement techniques in improving consonant intelligibility for a range of different speakers and for groups of listeners with different language backgrounds.
Intelligibility of clear and conversational speech of young and elderly talkers.
  • D. Schum
  • Education
    Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
  • 1996
Investigation of the ability of both younger and older talkers to produce clear speech after a minimal amount of instruction and practice indicated that both groups of talkers could effect significant intelligibility improvements despite minimal instruction andpractice.
Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech.
It is concluded that the simple processing to alter the relative durations of the speech materials was not adequate to assess the contribution of speaking rate to the intelligibility differences; further studies are proposed to address this question.
Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech.
The results of acoustic analyses performed on the conversational and clear speech show speaking rate decreases substantially in clear speech, and the RMS intensities for obstruent sounds, particularly stop consonants, is greater in clearspeech than in conversational speech.
Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate.
Key-word scores for materials produced by a professional talker were inversely correlated with speaking rate, but conversational rate scores did not approach those of clear speech for other talkers.
Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.
Results showed that the ability to take advantage of surface phonetic information, such as a consistent talker across items, is a perceptual skill that transfers easily from first to second language perception, but non-native listeners had particular difficulty with lexically hard words even when familiarity with the items was controlled, suggesting that non- native word recognition may be compromised when fine phonetic discrimination at the segmental level is required.
Perception of consonants in reverberation by native and non-native listeners.
It is indicated that non‐native listeners who understand English very well in the absence of reverberation might have difficulty understanding speech in the presence of even moderate reverberation.