The case for motivated reasoning.

@article{Kunda1990TheCF,
  title={The case for motivated reasoning.},
  author={Ziva Kunda},
  journal={Psychological bulletin},
  year={1990},
  volume={108 3},
  pages={
          480-98
        }
}
  • Z. Kunda
  • Published 1 November 1990
  • Philosophy
  • Psychological bulletin
It is proposed that motivation may affect reasoning through reliance on a biased set of cognitive processes--that is, strategies for accessing, constructing, and evaluating beliefs. The motivation to be accurate enhances use of those beliefs and strategies that are considered most appropriate, whereas the motivation to arrive at particular conclusions enhances use of those that are considered most likely to yield the desired conclusion. There is considerable evidence that people are more likely… 

Motivated belief and agency

Abstract Can the existence of motivationally biased beliefs plausibly be explained without appealing to actions that are aimed at producing or protecting these beliefs? Drawing upon some recent work

Motivated Reasoning: A Depth-of-Processing Perspective

We show how motivation affects reasoning through reliance on a biased set of cognitive processes. We manipulate the level of brand preference experimentally and expose subjects to a message that is

Instrumental Bias in Motivated Reasoning: More When More Is Needed

Abstract Decision makers must often make judgments in an environment in which they have a strong motivation to reach a particular conclusion. While normative theory would indicate that they should

The practice of motivated reasoning:

Motivated reasoning theory is a psychological theory that reads that policymakers interpret evidence in ways that fit their preferences rather than assessing it neutrally. The theory is increasingly

Flexibility in MotiVated reasoning: strategic sHiFts oF reasoning Modes in coVariation judgMent

Research on motivated reasoning has shown that people with certain preferred conclusions sometimes treat information in different ways, depending on what best serves those conclusions. However, this

I want to believe: delusion, motivated reasoning, and Bayesian decision theory

TLDR
A computational model of delusion is proposed based on a Bayesian decision framework that proposes that beliefs are not only evaluated based on their accuracy, but also based on the cost of rejecting them, which might contribute to the genesis of delusions.

The Role of Motivated Reasoning in Optimistic Time Predictions

The authors explore the well-documented tendency for people to predict that they will finish tasks earlier than they actually do. Whereas previous research has tied this optimistic bias to the

Do People Engage in Motivated Reasoning to Think the World Is a Good Place for Others

Motivated reasoning is a bias in inference in which people distort their updating process in the direction of more attractive beliefs. Prior work has shown how motivated reasoning leads people to

Toward A Cognitive Science Of Beliefs

Beliefs are, or at least appear to be, integral to cognition and action. Though there are scarcely features of human psychology more intuitive to their bearers, beliefs are surprisingly elusive
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 130 REFERENCES

Ducking the collection of costly evidence: Motivated use of statistical heuristics

We examined whether motivation affects people's use of statistical heuristics. In two studies, subjects had to decide how many instances to observe before making predictions. Half the subjects were

Reasons for confidence.

People are often overconfident in evaluating the correctness of their knowledge. The present studies investigated the possibility that assessment of confidence is biased by attempts to justify one's

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory

People are often overconfident in evaluating the correctness of their knowledge. The present studies investigated the possibility that assessment of confidence is biased by attempts to justify one's

Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment.

TLDR
In two separate but conceptually parallel experiments, the induction of a consider-the-opposite strategy had greater corrective effect than more demand-laden alternative instructions to be as fair and unbiased as possible.

Perceived Informativeness of Facts.

There are many tasks in which people are called on to disregard information that they have already processed. Dealing with inadmissible evidence in a courtroom setting, second-guessing the past, and

Bias and error in human judgment

Currently prevalent views of human inference are contrasted with an integrated theory of the epistemic process. The prevailing views are characterized by the following orienting assumptions: (1)

The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning

In reasoning about everyday problems, people use statistical heuristics, that is, judgmental tools that are rough intuitive equivalents of statistical principles. Statistical heuristics have improved

Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing

Strategies for hypothesis testing in scientific investigation and everyday reasoning have interested both psychologists and philosophers. A number of these scholars stress the importance of

Lay epistemo-logic—process and contents: Another look at attribution theory.

A theory of the lay epistemic process is outlined. According to this theory knowledge-seeking behavior is initiated by a purpose that a person has for reaching a given inference and consists of the
...