The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity

@article{Bastolla2009TheAO,
  title={The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity},
  author={Ugo Bastolla and Miguel A. Fortuna and Alberto Pascual-Garc{\'i}a and Antonio Ferrera and Bartolo Luque and Jordi Bascompte},
  journal={Nature},
  year={2009},
  volume={458},
  pages={1018-1020}
}
The main theories of biodiversity either neglect species interactions or assume that species interact randomly with each other. However, recent empirical work has revealed that ecological networks are highly structured, and the lack of a theory that takes into account the structure of interactions precludes further assessment of the implications of such network patterns for biodiversity. Here we use a combination of analytical and empirical approaches to quantify the influence of network… Expand

Figures and Topics from this paper

Complex systems: Cooperative network dynamics
TLDR
Bastolla et al. look at the mutualistic networks between plants and animals and find that the 'nestedness' of mutualistic interactions acts to minimize competition and enhance biodiversity. Expand
Disentangling nestedness from models of ecological complexity
TLDR
Nestedness is, at best, a secondary covariate rather than a causative factor for biodiversity in mutualistic communities, and analysis of complex networks should be accompanied by analysis of simpler, underpinning mechanisms that drive multiple higher-order network properties. Expand
Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks
TLDR
This work shows analytically that the abundance of the rarest species is linked directly to the resilience of the community, and provides a unifying framework for studying the emergent structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks. Expand
Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks
TLDR
This work analytically shows that the abundance of the rarest species is directly linked to the resilience of the community, and provides a unifying framework for studying the emergent structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks. Expand
How ecological networks evolve
TLDR
This work shows that several types of ecological interactions share common evolutionary mechanisms that can be parametrised based on extant interaction data, and finds that a model mimicking birth-death processes for species interactions describes the structure of extant networks remarkably well. Expand
The ecological and evolutionary implications of merging different types of networks.
TLDR
This work outlines a conceptual framework for studying networks composed of more than one type of interaction, highlighting key questions and research areas that would benefit from their study. Expand
The ghost of nestedness in ecological networks.
TLDR
It is shown that complex ecological networks are binary nested, but quantitative preferences are non-nested, indicating limited consumer overlap of favoured resources, and it is concluded that species preferences are partitioned to avoid competition, thereby benefiting system-wide resource allocation. Expand
Network Dynamics Contribute to Structure: Nestedness in Mutualistic Networks
TLDR
It is found that the evolution of these interactions, reflecting the trade-off of resources, could be used to accurately predict that nestedness occurs significantly more often than expect due to chance alone in a mutualistic network. Expand
Why network analysis is often disconnected from community ecology: A critique and an ecologist's guide
TLDR
It is shown analytically that ‘dependence asymmetries’ between two species only reflect variation in their total observation frequencies, and that niche-based and impact-based interpretations may help to bridge terminological and conceptual gaps between network pattern analyses and traditional community ecology. Expand
The joint influence of competition and mutualism on the biodiversity of mutualistic ecosystems
TLDR
It is found that mutualism does not have the same consequences on the evolution of specialist and generalist species, and that there is a non-trivial profile of biodiversity in the parameter space of competition and mutualism. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 40 REFERENCES
The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks
TLDR
It is shown that mutualistic networks are highly nested; that is, the more specialist species interact only with proper subsets of those species interacting with the more generalists, which generates highly asymmetrical interactions and organizes the community cohesively around a central core of interactions. Expand
The modularity of pollination networks
TLDR
If these key species go extinct, modules and networks may break apart and initiate cascades of extinction, Thus, species serving as hubs and connectors should receive high conservation priorities. Expand
Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks
TLDR
This work uses phylogenetic methods to show that the phylogenetic relationships of species predict the number of interactions they exhibit in more than one-third of the networks, and the identity of the species with which they interact in about half of the Networks. Expand
Network structural properties mediate the stability of mutualistic communities.
TLDR
It is shown that structural properties can alter the stability of mutualistic communities characterized by nonlinear functional responses among the interacting species, and that interplay between the structure and function of ecological networks in general and consideration of mutualists interactions in particular may be key to understanding complexity-stability relationships of biological communities as a whole. Expand
A simple model of bipartite cooperation for ecological and organizational networks
TLDR
This work proposes a highly parsimonious model that can reproduce the overall bipartite structure of cooperative partner–partner interactions, as exemplified by plant–animal mutualistic networks, and tests it on ten large pollination data sets. Expand
Biodiversity in model ecosystems, II: species assembly and food web structure.
TLDR
The ecological overlap between species and shared preys provides a quantitative measure of the effective interspecies competition and of the trophic network topology in species assembly models where the population dynamics is kept far from fixed points through the continuous introduction of new species. Expand
Habitat loss and the structure of plant-animal mutualistic networks.
TLDR
This model is the first attempt to describe the dynamics of whole mutualistic metacommunities interacting in realistic ways and shows that the community response to habitat loss is affected by network structure. Expand
Biodiversity in model ecosystems, I: coexistence conditions for competing species.
TLDR
The narrower the productivity distribution is, the more species can stably coexist, and how this result limits the maximal biodiversity that a trophic level can host is discussed. Expand
Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance
TLDR
By using a simple dynamical model, it is shown that asymmetries inherent in coevolutionary networks may enhance long-term coexistence and facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Expand
Ecological networks and their fragility
TLDR
E ecological networks, in which species are linked together, either directly or indirectly through intermediate species, have well defined patterns that both illuminate the ecological mechanisms underlying them and promise a better understanding of the relationship between complexity and ecological stability. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...