The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers.

@article{Wilson2007TheW,
  title={The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers.},
  author={Richard H. Wilson and Crystal S Carnell and Amber L Cleghorn},
  journal={Journal of the American Academy of Audiology},
  year={2007},
  volume={18 6},
  pages={
          522-9
        }
}
The Words-in-Noise (WIN) test uses monosyllabic words in seven signal-to-noise ratios of multitalker babble (MTB) to evaluate the ability of individuals to understand speech in background noise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the criterion validity of the WIN by comparing recognition performances under MTB and speech-spectrum noise (SSN) using listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. The MTB and SSN had identical rms and similar spectra but different amplitude… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Word recognition performance in competing sentence and multitalker babble paradigms in listeners with hearing loss
The word-recognition performances of 24 listeners with normal hearing and of 72 listeners with hearing loss were evaluated using a single-talker competing message (CM) and a six-talker multitalker
Performance of normal-hearing listeners on the Repeat-Recall test in different noise configurations
TLDR
Performance differences among noise configurations provided a preliminary basis for comparison with hearing-impaired listeners’ performance on the RRT and revealed that repeat scores were significantly better for 2TBN, for noise at 180°, and for high context (HC) sentences.
Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
TLDR
Data suggest that HI listeners retain more of an ability to listen in the dips of a fluctuating masker than previously thought, and a modified version of the extended speech-intelligibility index that predicts a larger FMB at less favorable SNRs accounted for most of the FMB differences between listener groups and modalities.
Perception of Tamil Mono-Syllabic and Bi-Syllabic Words in Multi-Talker Speech Babble by Young Adults with Normal Hearing
TLDR
It is indicated that higher SNR leads to better performance in young normal hearing adults in the presence of multi-talker speech babble at two signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), and bi-syllabic words were identified with minimal errors compared to mono-syllingtonic words.
Diagnostic Accuracy of the AzBio Speech Recognition in Noise Test.
TLDR
The AzBio test was not a significant predictor of a self-reported SRN disorder or aSelf-reported SNR loss in steady-state noise, but it was a significant predictors of the average across all noise conditions.
Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
TLDR
The results on the WIN from both the previous laboratory studies and the current clinical study indicate that the WIN is an appropriate clinic instrument to assess word-recognition performance in background noise.
Effects of Various Background Noises on Speech Intelligibility of Normal Hearing Subjects
TLDR
These results support that multitalker babble noise using the voices of Korean speakers influence on normal listener’s speech intelligibility more than speech noise from English sentences or white noise.
Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
TLDR
Investigation of speech-in-interrupted-noise paradigm experiments indicates that interrupted noise does provide a better differentiation both between listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss and among listeners with Hearing loss than is provided by continuous noise.
Speech Reception Thresholds for Polish Language Word and Sentence Tests Presented in Noise
TLDR
It was shown that the time needed for presentation of a single word list (NAL-93, short method) or single sentence list (PST, PSMT) was comparable and equal to 2–3 minutes, and the most uniform SRT values were obtained for PST.
The French MBAA2 sentence recognition in noise test for cochlear implant users.
TLDR
The MBAA2 test has high test-retest reliability for percent correct and SNR50, and is suitable for the assessment of cochlear implant patients, and it is proposed to reduce the number of MBAA 2 test lists to reduce variability.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance.
A simple word-recognition task in multitalker babble for clinic use was developed in the course of four experiments involving listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. In
Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
TLDR
This paper describes a shortened and improved version of the Speech in Noise (SIN) Test, which measures the SNR a listener requires to understand 50% of key words in sentences in a background of babble.
The 500 Hz masking-level difference and word recognition in multitalker babble for 40- to 89-year-old listeners with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss.
TLDR
Neither pure-tone thresholds nor word-recognition abilities in quiet accurately predicted word- Recognition performance in multitalker babble in listeners with normal hearing and for listeners with hearing loss.
Speech recognition in multitalker babble using digits, words, and sentences.
The purpose of this mixed model design was to examine recognition performance differences when measuring speech recognition in multitalker babble on listeners with normal hearing (n = 36) and
The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
TLDR
The results suggest that reduced masking release for speech in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss can only sometimes be accounted for entirely by reduced audibility.
Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.
TLDR
The mean-squared level of each digitally recorded sentence was adjusted to equate intelligibility when presented in spectrally matched noise to normal-hearing listeners, and statistical reliability and efficiency suit it to practical applications in which measures of speech intelligibility are required.
Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
TLDR
The speech-reception threshold (SRT) for sentences presented in a fluctuating interfering background sound of 80 dBA SPL is measured and it is shown that hearing-impaired individuals perform poorer than suggested by the loss of audibility for some parts of the speech signal.
Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing.
TLDR
It is suggested that hearing-impaired listeners obtain less release from masking in AM noise than do normal-hearing listeners even when both the speech and noise are presented at levels that are above threshold over much of the speech frequency range.
New speech-in-noise test in different types of hearing impairment.
TLDR
The SRTN turned out to be significantly elevated in cases with sensorineural hearing impairment; this elevation was related to the grade of hearing impairment and no essential difference was seen between the S RTN values of subjects with mixed hearing impaired and persons with normal hearing.
An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
TLDR
The QuickSin and WIN materials are more sensitive measures of recognition performance in background noise than are the BKB-SIN and HINT materials.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...