The Who/Whom Puzzle: On The Preservation Of An Archaic Feature

@article{Lasnik2000TheWP,
  title={The Who/Whom Puzzle: On The Preservation Of An Archaic Feature},
  author={Howard Lasnik and Nicholas Sobin},
  journal={Natural Language \& Linguistic Theory},
  year={2000},
  volume={18},
  pages={343-371}
}
It is commonly assumed that the English interrogative/relative pronounwhom is parallel to him and them in manifesting objective pronominal Case. We argue instead that whom is not Case-marked along with these pronouns. Rather, its Case marking follows a different paradigm. Whom in modern English derives from a set of extra-grammatical rules called 'grammatical viruses'. Speakers call upon such rules to check Case and (possibly) agreement features which the normal system of syntax cannot check… 
The perfect participle paradox: some implications for the architecture of grammar1
The topic of this article can be exemplified by the final clause of the following attested sentence: I don't know how he found out that she belonged to that lass, but find out he has. Clauses like
Competing constraints and hypercorrect whom: Syntactic uncertainty meets linguistic insecurity
In Modern English the distribution of the prestige form whom is highly restricted. It only occurs with any frequency as complement of P, yet grammarians and linguists have long noted its usage in
An Introduction to English Sentence Structure: Agreement, case and A-movement
Overview In this chapter, we take a look at the syntax of agreement. We begin by outlining the claim made by Chomsky in recent work that agreement involves a relation between a probe and a goal
Structure and Ontology in Nonlocal Readings of Adjectives
TLDR
It is argued that these adjectives including average and occasional actually have the semantic type of quantificational determiners like every other adjectives, and that these two distinct modes of explanation play a crucial role in bringing about the apparently aberrant behavior of this class of adjectives.
An HPSG approach to the who/whom puzzle
  • Takafumi Maekawa
  • Linguistics
    Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar
  • 2005
TLDR
This paper focuses on the distribution of the English relative and interrogative pronouns who and whom, and shows that a small number of constraints can accommodate the seemingly complex body of data.
Th/Ex, agreement, and case in expletive sentences
Recent accounts of existential sentences (ES) within the government-and-binding/Minimalist Program tradition (Chomsky 2000, 2001; Deal 2009) claim that nominative Case valuation and ϕ-agreement take
The case for politeness: Pronoun variation in co-ordinate NPs in object position in English
The use of the nominative 1sg pronouns in co-ordinate NPs in object position, most famously between you and I, has received much attention from prescriptivists and formal linguists, but it has never
Introducing Special Issues in BIOLINGUISTICS
phenomenon, the grammatical marking of discourse reference and clausal argument structure by the category . Just after the acquisition of V2 (at week 125), the use of the variant elements before
Syntacticizing blends : the case of English wh-raising
TLDR
It is suggested that extracted subjects can exceptionally be ‘hyperactive’ (Carstens 2011), and thus take part in A-relations (case and agreement) in more than one clausal domain.
Conventionalization of grammatical anomalies through linearization
This article explores the diachronic influence of linear form in the grammaticalization of new constructions, especially those with distinctive functional and structural properties. For example, it
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 15 REFERENCES
The Minimalist Program
In his foundational book, The Minimalist Program, published in 1995, Noam Chomsky offered a significant contribution to the generative tradition in linguistics. This twentieth-anniversary edition
Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses
Certain constructions of prestige English, including nominative Case in coordination and plural agreement in expletive constructions, pose difficulties for speakers of English uncharacteristic of
The Internal Structure of Small Clauses: New Evidence from Inversion
TLDR
It is shown that there is reason to question the assumption that the copula has some unique property that allows it alone to function as the "pivot" around which inversion of subject and predicate can occur, and hence that an analysis must be found that can derive the distribution of the inverse construction without an appeal to any property unique to theCopula.
The syntactic phenomena of English
TLDR
New to this edition are sections on appositive constructions, parasitic gaps, contrastive negation, and comparative conditional sentences, as well as expanded coverage of cleft sentences and free relatives.
The Philosophy of Grammar
1. Living grammar 2. Systematic grammar 3. Systematic grammar (continued) 4. Parts of speech 5. Substantive and adjectives 6. Parts of speech (concluded) 7. The three ranks 8. Junction and nexus 9.
A Study of Case Assignment in Coordinate Noun Phrases.
L'A. examine chez 46 lyceens, locuteurs natifs anglais, la maniere dont ils attribuent le cas pour coordonner des syntagmes nominaux dans trois positions differentes (sujet, objet du verbe, objet de
Root and structure-preserving transformations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Foreign Literatures and Linguistics. Thesis. 1970. Ph.D.
...
1
2
...