The Use and Threat of Injunctions in the Rand Context

@article{Ratliff2013TheUA,
  title={The Use and Threat of Injunctions in the Rand Context},
  author={James D. Ratliff and Daniel L. Rubinfeld},
  journal={Journal of Competition Law and Economics},
  year={2013},
  volume={9},
  pages={1-22}
}
We model a dispute between the owner of a standard-essential patent and implementer of the standard over which the patentee's license offer is reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND). An injunction is not rule out, yet that threat does not lead to holdup. A key element is that the implementer always has as a last-resortthe ability to accept license terms that are either certified by a court as RAND or mutually agreed upon by the patentee and implementer. 

The Effect of FRAND Commitments on Patent Remedies

This chapter addresses a special category of cases in which an asserted patent is, or has been declared to be, essential to the implementation of a collaboratively-developed voluntary consensus

FRAND Royalties and Injunctions for Standard Essential Patents

  • J. Choi
  • Economics
    SSRN Electronic Journal
  • 2014
Abstract I develop a stylized model of court procedures that resolve disputes concerning FRAND-encumbered standard essential patents (SEPs). I analyze the effects of injunctions and potential

Standard Essential Patents Litigation and Abuse of a Dominant Position: The 'FRAND' Defense in the EU Competition Law Context

This dissertation first discusses industry standards, defined as any set of technical specifications providing for products’ interoperability. Standards are adopted by standard-setting organizations

Facilitating Negotiation for Licensing Standard Essential Patents in the Shadow of Injunctive Relief Possibilities

Apple and Samsung, two of the world’s premier technology companies, have recently been involved in heated legal disputes over certain patents and related technologies. Lawsuits were filed in many

Injunctive Relief

Patent systems commonly empower courts to order accused or adjudged infringers to refrain from continuing infringing conduct in the future. Some patentees file suit for the primary purpose of

Seeking injunctions in SEPs infringement proceedings as an abuse of dominant position under Article 102 TFEU

Even though standards have beneficial effects in the network-dependent information and communication technologies industry, they also bring along competition law concerns, especially since they are

Standard-Essential Patents: Frand Commitments, Injunctions and the Smartphone Wars

This article examines a number of cases which have arisen in the EU and which raise the question of whether a holder of a standard-essential patent (SEP) which has given a commitment to license that

A Welfare Economic Interpretation of FRAND

Setting an industry-wide standard is crucial for information and communication technologies for interoperability, compatibility and efficiency. To minimize holdup problems, patent holders are often

Disentangling the FRAND Conundrum

Courts, antitrust authorities, and policy makers across the world have been over concerned by holdup risks involving the strategic use of standard essential patents (SEPs). In order to avoid or at

The Effect of Competition Law on Patent Remedies

Although competition law and IP law probably pursue complementary goals, competition laws can: (i) affect remedies available for patent infringement; and/or otherwise, (ii) limit the conduct of
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES

Ten Things to do About Patent Holdup of Standards (and One Not To)

Congress, the courts, scholars, and the press have focused more and more attention on what is shaping up to be the central public policy problem in intellectual property law today: the problem of

Understanding the RAND Commitment

In a typical agreement between a buyer and a seller, price is one of the central terms specified in the deal. Yet, in a surprisingly large number of technology agreements, patent holders today are

STANDARD SETTING, PATENTS, AND HOLD-UP

Standard setting raises a variety of antitrust issues. Cooperative standard setting often involves horizontal competitors agreeing on certain specifications of the products they plan to market,

Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior

PRETRIAL bargaining may be described as a game played in the shadow of the law. There are two possible outcomes: settlement out of court through bargaining, and trial, which represents a bargaining

Can Standard-Setting Lead to Exploitative Abuse? A Dissonant View on Patent Hold-Up, Royalty Stacking and the Meaning of FRAND

Standard-setting activities, which aim to achieve device interoperability and product compatibility, play a fundamental role in fostering innovation and competition in a variety of markets. Such

Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking

We study several interconnected problems that arise under the current U.S. patent system when a patent covers one component or feature of a complex product. This situation is common in the

Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and Their Resolution

ECONOMIC THOUGHT ABOUT LAW iS old, but the economic analysis of law, which relies on formal models, is new.1 A little over 30 years ago, economics was relegated by lawyers to the technical role of

Patent Reform: Aligning Reward and Contribution

  • C. Shapiro
  • Economics
    Innovation Policy and the Economy
  • 2007
Economists and policymakers have long recognized that innovators must be able to appropriate a reasonable portion of the social benefits of their innovations if innovation is to be suitably rewarded

Antitrust Issues in the Licensing of Intellectual Property: The Nine No-No's Meet the Nineties

"KNOWLEDGE ASSETS"-research and development know-how and intellectual property protected by patent, copyright, and trade secrethave become increasingly important as a determinant of U.S. industrial

Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations

The role of institutions in mediating the use of intellectual property rights has long been neglected in debates over the economics of intellectual property. In a path-breaking work, Rob Merges