The Usability of Computerized Card Sorting : A Comparison of Three Applications by Researchers and End Users

@inproceedings{Chaparro2008TheUO,
  title={The Usability of Computerized Card Sorting : A Comparison of Three Applications by Researchers and End Users},
  author={Barbara S. Chaparro and Veronica D. Hinkle},
  year={2008}
}
Copyright © 2007-2008, Usability Professionals’ Association and the authors. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. URL: http… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 19 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 12 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-5 of 5 references

SUS: A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale

  • J. Brooke
  • 1996
Highly Influential
6 Excerpts

Understanding Your Users: A practical guide to user requirements: Methods, Tools, & Techniques (pp. 415-456)

  • C. Courage, K. Baxter
  • 2005
1 Excerpt

Computer-based card sort training tool: is it comparable to manual card sorting

  • M. Harper, L. R. Van Duyne
  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic…
  • 2002

The automated card-sort as an interface design tool: a comparison of products

  • M. J. Zavod, D. E. Rickert, S. H. Brown
  • Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics…
  • 2002

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…