The Unnatural Nature of Science

@article{Wolpert1993TheUN,
  title={The Unnatural Nature of Science},
  author={Lewis Wolpert and Richard C. Horton},
  journal={The Lancet},
  year={1993},
  volume={341}
}
The Medawar Lecture 1998 Is science dangerous?
  • L. Wolpert
  • Education
    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • 2005
TLDR
The idea that science is dangerous is deeply embedded in the authors' culture, particularly in literature, yet science provides the best way of understanding the world and the obligation of scientists is to make public both any social implications of their work and its technological applications.
Maya knowledge and "science wars"
TLDR
Yucatec Maya cthnobiology agrees with contemporary international biological science in many respects, almost all of them highly specific, pragmatic and observational, but differs in many other respects, most of themhighly inferential and cosmological.
History and Philosophy of Science as a Guide to Understanding Nature of Science
Nature of science (NOS) is considered to be a controversial topic by historians, philosophers of science and science educators. It is paradoxical that we all teach science and still have difficulties
Demarcating Science from Non-Science
Defending Science from all of its Enemies and some of its Friends
Recent debates about the values and virtues of the sciences have been marked by philosophical errors and misunderstandings among both the supporters and the critics of the value of science. Some
Emergence of scientific explanations of nature in ancient Greece. The only scientific discovery?
TLDR
Although modern science provides valuable insights regarding the mechanisms of heart disease, it is an illusion to believe that the authors' modern system explains everything.
Who Speaks for Science?
TLDR
Teachers can help students learn how to navigate the treacherous territory of inevitably mediated communication and the vulnerabilities of epistemic dependence and the deceptive strategies used by imitators of science to seem like credible voices for science.
Metaphilosophy, Folk-Philosophy and Naturalized Philosophy
The claim that philosophy belongs to the realm of culture does not provoke substantial objections. However, if one is invited to consider the advisability of analysing philosophy as if it was just
Reflections on Naturalism
To naturalists, there is no such thing as complete justification for any claim, and so requiring complete warrant for naturalist proposals is an unreasonable request. The proper guideline for
...
...