The Suffragist Peace Joslyn N . Barnhart
@inproceedings{Dafoe2018TheSP, title={The Suffragist Peace Joslyn N . Barnhart}, author={A. Dafoe and E. N. Saunders and R. Trager}, year={2018} }
Preferences for conflict and cooperation are systematically different for men and women. At each stage of the escalatory ladder, women prefer more peaceful options. They are less apt to approve of the use of force and the striking of hard bargains internationally, and more apt to approve of substantial concessions to preserve peace. They impose higher audience costs because they are more approving of leaders who simply remain out of conflicts, but they are also more willing to see their leaders… CONTINUE READING
Figures and Tables from this paper
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES
The Politics of Risking Peace: Do Hawks or Doves Deliver the Olive Branch?
- Political Science
- 2005
- 95
- PDF
The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992
- Economics
- 1999
- 479
- PDF
A Preference for War: How Fairness and Rhetoric Influence Leadership Incentives in Crises
- Economics
- 2016
- 16
- PDF
The Political Costs of Crisis Bargaining: Presidential Rhetoric and the Role of Party
- Political Science
- 2011
- 120
- PDF
War and the Inner Circle: Democratic Elites and the Politics of Using Force
- Political Science
- 2015
- 43
- PDF