The Status and Future of the Turing Test

  title={The Status and Future of the Turing Test},
  author={James H. Moor},
  journal={Minds and Machines},
  • J. Moor
  • Published 1 February 2001
  • Psychology
  • Minds and Machines
The standard interpretation of the imitation game is defended over the rival gender interpretation though it is noted that Turing himself proposed several variations of his imitation game. The Turing test is then justified as an inductive test not as an operational definition as commonly suggested. Turing's famous prediction about his test being passed at the 70% level is disconfirmed by the results of the Loebner 2000 contest and the absence of any serious Turing test competitors from AI on… 
Updating the Turing Test Wittgenstein, Turing and Symbol Manipulation
In this paper I present an argument against the feasibility of the Imitation Game as a test for thinking or language understanding. The argument is different from the five objections presented by
Passing the Turing Test Does Not Mean the End of Humanity
Claims that passing the Turing test means that machines will have achieved human-like intelligence and as a consequence the singularity will be upon us in the blink of an eye are considered.
Can machines think? The controversy that led to the Turing test
Turing’s much debated test has turned 70 and is still fairly controversial. His 1950 paper is seen as a complex and multilayered text, and key questions about it remain largely unanswered. Why did
What’s in a thought experiment: the role of gender in Alan Turing’s progressive imitation game
It is shown that Turing designed his imitation game as a thought experiment to refute, among other things, an a priori view of Jefferson that intelligence was an exclusive feature of the animal nervous system, and that interesting behavior in the male and the female was largely determined by sex hormones.
Rethinking Turing's Test and the Philosophical Implications
It is argued that Turing’s writings suggest a new form of free will compatibilism, which is called response-dependence compatibilanism, and the philosophical implications of rethinking Turing's test go yet further.
Taking the fifth amendment in Turing’s imitation game
This paper considers the possibility of a machine passing the Turing test simply by not saying anything, and includes a number of transcripts from practical Turing tests in which silence has actually occurred on the part of a hidden entity.
The imitation game
In this special issue of Kybernetes a selection of authors with a special interest in Turing’s work have been invited to explore and clarify issues arising from Turing's 1950 paper on the imitation game; now more widely known as the Turing test.
The Accidental Philosopher and One of the Hardest Problems in the World
Given the difficulties of defining “machine” and “think”, Turing proposed to replace the question “Can machines think?” with a proxy: how well can an agent engage in sustained conversation with a
Can machines think? A report on Turing test experiments at the Royal Society
In this article we consider transcripts that originated from a practical series of Turing's Imitation Game that was held on 6 and 7 June 2014 at the Royal Society London. In all cases the tests
Wittgensteinian Perspectives on the Turing Test
This paper discusses some difficulties in understanding the Turing test. It emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between conceptual and empirical perspectives and highlights the former as


Turing's Rules for the Imitation Game
A study of Turing's rules for the test in the context of his advocated purpose and his other texts finds that there are several independent and mutually reinforcing lines of evidence that support the standard reading, while fitting the literal reading in Turing's work faces severe interpretative difficulties.
Subcognition and the Limits of the TuringTest
Alan Turing, in his original article' about an imitation-game definition of intelligence, seems to be making two separate claims. The first, the philosophical claim, is that if a machine could pass
Look Who's Moving the Goal Posts Now
The abjection of Turing's first prediction confirms the aptness of the Imitation Game test as a test of human level intelligence and lends ever-growing support to the hypothesis that computers will think at a human level eventually, despite the abject failure of Turing’s first prediction.
The Cartesian Test for Automatism1
  • G. Erion
  • Philosophy
    Minds and Machines
  • 2004
It is argued that the action test is best understood as a test of common sense, and that contemporary artificial intelligence should consider using it as a guide for future research.
Turing's Two Tests for Intelligence*
The first test realizes a possibility that philosophers have overlooked: a test that uses a human's linguistic performance in setting an empirical test of intelligence, but does not make behavioral similarity to that performance the criterion of intelligence.
Passing Loebner's Turing Test: A Case of Conflicting Discourse Functions1
This paper argues that the Turing test is based on a fixed and de-contextualized view of communicative competence, and that the contest designers need to resolve this ambiguity in discourse function to encourage the production of software that can pass for human on the level of conversational ability.
Turing's Test and Conscious Thought
Other bodies, other minds: A machine incarnation of an old philosophical problem
The Total Turing Test (TTT) calls instead for all of the authors' linguistic and robotic capacities; immune to Searle's argument, it suggests how to ground a symbol manipulating system in the capacity to pick out the objects its symbols refer to.
The Pseudorealization Fallacy and the Chinese Room Argument
John Searle with his now-famous Chinese room argument (1980, 1982, 1984) challenges the basis for a strong version of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Searle’s argument has generated diverse and often
The Turing Test*
Recently unpublished material by Turing casts fresh light on his thinking and dispels a number of philosophical myths concerning the Turing test.