The State of the Discipline: One Interpretation of Everyone's Favorite Controversy

@article{Parenti1983TheSO,
  title={The State of the Discipline: One Interpretation of Everyone's Favorite Controversy},
  author={Michael Parenti},
  journal={PS: Political Science \& Politics},
  year={1983},
  volume={16},
  pages={189 - 196}
}
  • M. Parenti
  • Published 1983
  • Education
  • PS: Political Science & Politics
Michael Parenti dominant organizing principles and assumptions of the prevailing paradigm. And paradigmatic dominance is achieved and maintained partly by means exogenous to the science itself, for instance, by financial support, authoritative opinion and ideological orthodoxy. Scientists have paid dearly for maintaining certain views and their oppressors often have been other scientists working in hand with the authorities of university, state or church. 

Patricians, Professionals, and Political Science

  • M. Parenti
  • History
    American Political Science Review
  • 2006
This essay sketches the strictures put on political scholarship from the early days of patrician amateurs to modern academic professionals, with special attention given to the emergence of political

The Politics of Studying Politics: Political Science Since the 1960s

The field of political science has undergone significant change since the 1960s. The major shift was toward far greater quantification in the scholarly analyses. That movement sparked enduring

History of the Caucus for a New Political Science

This year, at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (APSA) in Chicago, the Caucus for a New Political Science celebrated its 40th anniversary, which makes the Caucus

Scholasticism in Political Science

  • L. Mead
  • Education
    Perspectives on Politics
  • 2010
Criticism of trends in political science centers on specific methodologies—quantitative methods or rational choice. However, the more worrisome development is scholasticism—a tendency for research to

Integration and Fragmentation in Political Science: Exploring Patterns of Scholarly Communication in a Divided Discipline

Political science is generally thought of as a discipline with strong divisions and often intense patterns of disagreement, most of which are driven by political scientists’ subfield and

The Coevolution of American Political Science and the American Political Science Review

  • L. Sigelman
  • History
    American Political Science Review
  • 2006
In November of 1906, the 3-year-old American Political Science Association, boasting a membership of “nearly four hundred” (Shaw 1907, 185), launched a journal devoted to scholarship, reviews, and

АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПОЛИТОЛОГИИ TOPICAL ISSUES OF POLITICAL SCIENCE

The article discusses the most well-known concepts of globalization, and attempts are made to highlight the principles of their typology. Accordingly, the main method reflected in the title of the

Reputation, Desintegration, theoretische Umorientierungen Zu einigen empirisch vernachlässigten Aspekten der Lage der Politikwissenschaft in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland

„The state of the discipline“ gehort unter Politikwissenschaftlern in den USA zu „everyone’s favorite controversy“ — so die Ankundigung eines entsprechenden Beitrages (Parenti 1983). Die laufende

Policy-Forschung und politische Institutionenanalyse — Verbindungslinien einer anscheinbaren Zerrüttung

Der Anspruch auf ein neues Paradigma mit eigenstandigen Methoden ist von deutschen Policy-Forschern kaum erhoben worden und ware auch nicht durchzuhalten gewesen (von Beyme, S. 10 ff). Die

References

Power and Pluralism: A View from the Bottom

  • M. Parenti
  • Political Science
    The Journal of Politics
  • 1970
It is said we live in a pluralistic society, and indeed a glance at the social map of America reveals a vast agglomeration of regional, class, occupational, and ethnic associations all busily making