The Stability of a Unipolar World

@article{Wohlforth1999TheSO,
  title={The Stability of a Unipolar World},
  author={William C. Wohlforth},
  journal={International Security},
  year={1999},
  volume={24},
  pages={5-41}
}
The collapse of the Soviet Union produced the greatest change in world power relationships since World War II. With Moscow’s headlong fall from superpower status, the bipolar structure that had shaped the security policies of the major powers for nearly half a century vanished, and the United States emerged as the sole surviving superpower. Commentators were quick to recognize that a new “unipolar moment” of unprecedented U.S. power had arrived.1 In 1992 the Pentagon drafted a new grand… 

A Newer World Order - The Return to a Multipolar Era

Abstract : In 1991 the international system's Bipolar Era and its balance of terror standoff between the United States and the Soviet Union ended peacefully and not as the result of a cataclysmic

The Rise and Fall of the Unipolar Concert

Foreign policy experts have struggled to describe the unusual character of contemporary world politics. Much of the debate revolves around the concept of polarity, which deals with how power is

The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China's Rise and the Fate of America's Global Position

Unipolarity is arguably the most popular concept used to analyze the U.S. global position that emerged in 1991, but the concept is totally inadequate for assessing how that position has changed in

The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States' Unipolar Moment

  • C. Layne
  • Political Science
    International Security
  • 2006
The conventional wisdom among U.S. grand strategists is that U.S. hegemony is exceptionalthat the United States need not worry about other states engaging in counterhegemonic balancing against it.

The Waning of U.S. HegemonyMyth or Reality A Review Essay

  • C. Layne
  • Political Science
    International Security
  • 2009
Over the next two decades, international politics will be shaped by whether the international system remains unipolar or is transformed into a multipolar system. Can the United States sustain its

Unrest Assured: Why Unipolarity Is Not Peaceful

The United States has been at war for thirteen of the twenty-two years since the Cold War ended and the world became unipolar. Still, the consensual view among international relations theorists is

The Perils of Bipolarity: Subnational Conflict and the Rise of China

Abstract : The United States emerged from the Cold War as the sole superpower in a unipolar international system. However, evidence suggests this unipolarity could soon change as a new bipolar system

This Time It's Real: The End of Unipolarity and the Pax Americana

Before the Great Recession’s foreshocks in fall 2007, most American security studies scholars believed that unipolarity—and perforce American hegemony—would be enduring features of international

Introduction: An Unbalanced World

In 1991, international politics entered a new era. For the first time in modern history, the world was unipolar: it had only one center of economic, military, and political power: the United States.

Polarity and International System Consequences

The collapse of the Soviet Union has produced the biggest change in the balance of power since World War II, thus transforming the bipolar system of the Cold War into a unipolar international system
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 78 REFERENCES

The Lonely Superpower

During the past decade global politics has changed fundamentally in two ways. First, it has been substantially reconfigured along cultural and civilizational lines, as I have highlighted in the pages

What was bipolarity?

  • R. Wagner
  • Psychology
    International Organization
  • 1993
In spite of its widespread use, no one has ever stated clearly what the distinction between bipolar and multipolar systems refers to. Moreover, some common definitions of “bipolarity” imply behavior

US hegemony and the perpetuation of NATO

Both history and neorealist alliance theory would seem to predict that once the Cold War ended, NATO would have unraveled. This, of course has not happened. The alliance has not only survived but

"Bismarck" or "Britain"?: Toward an American Grand Strategy after Bipolarity

~ D u r i n g the Forty Years War, also known as the Cold War, America's grand strategy was both elegant and efficient. It consisted of one word: "containment," and its purpose was the "break-up or

Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest

Scholars frequently portray World War II as an epic morality play driven by a villain (Hitler) and a sinner (Chamberlain). This book offers a fresh approach, combining both the attributes of states

A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War

In the United States the Cold War shaped our political culture, our institutions, and our national priorities. Abroad, it influenced the destinies of people everywhere. It divided Europe, split

Debating the Unipolar Moment

In his article, "Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy after the Cold War," Michael Mastanduno explores the ramifications of realist theory in an effort to refute

We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History

The end of the Cold War makes it possible, for the first time, to begin writing its history from a truly international perspective, one reflecting Soviet, East European, and Chinese as well as

Unipolar politics : realism and state strategies after the Cold War

1. Realism and International Relations After the Cold War, by Michael Mastanduno and Ethan B. Kapstein2. Realism and the Present Great Power System: Growth and Positional Conflict Over Scarce

The Political Economy of International Relations

After the end of World War II, the United States, by far the dominant economic and military power at that time, joined with the surviving capitalist democracies to create an unprecedented
...