The Stability and Durability of the US Supreme Court’s Legitimacy

  title={The Stability and Durability of the US Supreme Court’s Legitimacy},
  author={Michael J. Nelson and Patrick D. Tucker},
  journal={The Journal of Politics},
  pages={767 - 771}
Is support for the US Supreme Court stable over time? Recent studies present conflicting evidence about the extent to which dissatisfaction with the Court’s performance affects its public support. Drawing on a four-year panel study of Americans’ support for the Supreme Court, we demonstrate that the Court’s support has been remarkably stable in the aggregate, although there has been systematic change at the individual level. These individual-level changes are related to respondents… 
3 Citations

Judicial Philosophy and the Public’s Support for Courts

How do Americans’ preferences over judicial philosophy influence their support for judges and judicial decisions? Using an experiment attached to an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis, we find

Politicized Battles: How Vacancies and Partisanship Influence Support for the Supreme Court

Supreme Court vacancies are now characterized by great partisan efforts to confirm—or impede—the nomination. Amid a politicized vacancy before the 2020 election, there was cause to question the

III Governmental and Administrative Institutions / Institutions Politiques et Administratives

This paper offers a novel perspective on the benefits provided by the ro- tation of administrators within legislative systems, by exploring the Committee Secretariat (CS) of the European Parliament



The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court

Past empirical studies of factors affecting public support for the Supreme Court suggest: (1) the Supreme Court's decisions are more often congruent than incongruent with public opinion; (2) public

The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto

Research on the legitimacy of the US Supreme Court has blossomed of late, with scholars investigating many different hypotheses derived from legitimacy theory. As the theory has been pushed, a number

Is the U.S. Supreme Court's Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?

Bartels and Johnston have recently presented evidence suggesting that the legitimacy of the Supreme Court is grounded in the ideological preferences and perceptions of the American people. In

Backlash and Legitimation: Macro Political Responses to Supreme Court Decisions

This article is a first attempt to develop and assess the competing predictions of the thermostatic model of public opinion and legitimation theory for the responses of public mood to Supreme Court

The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court in a Polarized Polity

Conventional political science wisdom holds that contemporary American politics is characterized by deep and profound partisan and ideological divisions. Unanswered is the question of whether those

Legacy and Legitimacy: Black Americans and the Supreme Court

Preface 1. Legitimacy and American Democracy 2. Blacks, Civil Rights, and the Supreme Court 3. Establishing the Supreme Court's Legitimizing Capacity 4. Different Presses, Different Frames: Black and

Chief Justice Roberts's Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court's Legitimacy

The 2012 challenge to the Affordable Care Act was an unusual opportunity for people to form or reassess opinions about the Supreme Court. We utilize panel data coupled with as-if random assignment to

On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public

Conventional wisdom says that individuals’ ideological preferences do not influence Supreme Court legitimacy orientations. Most work is based on the assumption that the contemporary Court is

Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion

It is shown that the Court's decision did affect public attitudes but not as previous work would predict, and a theory resting on interpersonal influences to explain these results is developed, arguing that the social interpretation of events drives the differing outcomes.

The Best for Last: The Timing of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

This Article investigates the hypothesis that the most important and, often, controversial and divisive cases—so called “big” cases— are disproportionately decided at the end of June. We define a