The South After Shelby County

@article{Stephanopoulos2014TheSA,
  title={The South After Shelby County},
  author={N. Stephanopoulos},
  journal={The Supreme Court Review},
  year={2014},
  volume={2013},
  pages={55 - 134}
}
  • N. Stephanopoulos
  • Published 2014
  • Sociology
  • The Supreme Court Review
  • In Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court dismantled one of the two pillars of the Voting Rights Act: Section 5, which had barred southern jurisdictions from changing their election laws without receiving prior federal approval. But the Court left standing the VRA’s other pillar: Section 2, which prohibits racial discrimination in voting throughout the country. The burning question in the wake of Shelby County is what will happen to minority representation in the South now that Section 5… CONTINUE READING
    7 Citations

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 30 REFERENCES
    The Causal Context of Disparate Vote Denial
    • 5
    • PDF
    Elections and Alignment
    • 7
    This figure includes both published and unpublished Section 2 decisions from the 1982-2005 period
    • 2013
    About 96% of whites and about 92-94% of African-Americans currently have one of the R54-listed photo IDs
    • 2012
    South Carolina v United States, 898 F Supp 2d
    • 2012
    Several courts of appeal have rejected § 2 challenges based purely on a showing of some relevant statistical disparity between minorities and whites
    • & Power Dist
    • 1997
    Operation Push v Allain, 674 F Supp 1245
    • 1987
    57 SC L Rev at 724 (cited in note 10) (same); compare to Thornburg v Gingles, 478 US
    • 1986