The Social Cost of Carbon: Valuing Inequality, Risk, and Population for Climate Policy
@article{Fleurbaey2019TheSC, title={The Social Cost of Carbon: Valuing Inequality, Risk, and Population for Climate Policy}, author={M. Fleurbaey and Maddalena Ferranna and Mark Budolfson and Francis Dennig and Kian Mintz-Woo and R. Socolow and Dean Spears and St{\'e}phane Zuber}, journal={The Monist}, year={2019}, volume={102}, pages={84-109} }
We analyze the role of ethical values in the determination of the social cost of carbon, arguing that the familiar debate about discounting is too narrow. Other ethical issues are equally important to computing the social cost of carbon, and we highlight inequality, risk, and population ethics. Although the usual approach, in the economics of costbenefit analysis for climate policy, is confined to a utilitarian axiology, the methodology of the social cost of carbon is rather flexible and can be… Expand
9 Citations
Considering environmental costs of greenhouse gas emissions for setting a CO2 tax: A review.
- Economics, Medicine
- The Science of the total environment
- 2020
- 6
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 116 REFERENCES
The comparative importance for optimal climate policy of discounting, inequalities and catastrophes
- Economics, Medicine
- Climatic Change
- 2017
- 13
- PDF
Revisiting the social cost of carbon
- Geography, Medicine
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- 2017
- 328
- PDF
Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices
- Geography, Medicine
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- 2015
- 108
- PDF