The Social Brain

@article{Dunbar2014TheSB,
  title={The Social Brain},
  author={Robin I. M. Dunbar},
  journal={Current Directions in Psychological Science},
  year={2014},
  volume={23},
  pages={109 - 114}
}
  • Robin I. M. Dunbar
  • Published 1 April 2014
  • Psychology
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science
The social-brain hypothesis refers to a quantitative relationship between social-group size and neocortex volume in monkeys and apes. This relationship predicts a group size of approximately 150 for humans, which turns out to be the typical size of both social communities in small-scale societies and personal social networks in the modern world. This constraint on the size of social groups is partly cognitive and partly temporal. It gives rise to a layered structure in primate and human social… 

Figures from this paper

Social Working Memory Predicts Social Network Size in Humans
ObjectivesThe Social Brain Hypothesis posits a quantitative relationship between primate neocortex size and social network size. However, the precise social-cognitive mechanisms that drive this
Social brain volume is associated with in-degree social network size among older adults
TLDR
The results suggest that the in-degree aspect of social network size not only confirms the previously reported brain correlates of the social network but also shows an association in brain regions involved in the ability to infer other people's minds.
Resting functional connectivity of the left inferior frontal gyrus with the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex and temporoparietal junction reflects the social network size for active interactions
The size of an individual active social network is a key parameter of human social behavior and is correlated with subjective well‐being. However, it remains unknown how the social network size of
Do online social media cut through the constraints that limit the size of offline social networks?
TLDR
The data show that the size and range of online egocentric social networks, indexed as the number of Facebook friends, is similar to that of offline face-to-face networks, suggesting that, as originally proposed by the social brain hypothesis, there is a cognitive constraint on the size of social networks that even the communication advantages of online media are unable to overcome.
The enemy between us: The psychological and social costs of inequality
There is now substantial evidence that larger income differences in a society increase the prevalence of most of the health and social problems that tend to occur more frequently lower down the
Optimising human community sizes
  • Robin I. M. DunbarR. Sosis
  • Economics
    Evolution and human behavior : official journal of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society
  • 2018
How Does Social Network Position Influence Prosocial Behavior?
Evolutionary shifts dramatically reorganized the human hippocampal complex
TLDR
The shifts in HC size and subregional organization in the human lineage were the largest seen in all of primate evolution, rendering modern humans with a HC that is a clear outlier amongst all nonhuman primates investigated here.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 56 REFERENCES
Orbital prefrontal cortex volume predicts social network size: an imaging study of individual differences in humans
TLDR
The results support the social brain hypothesis by indicating a relationship between PFC volume and social network size that applies within species, and indicates that the relationship is mediated by social cognitive skills.
Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans
TLDR
It is suggested that the evolution of large groups in the human lineage depended on developing a more efficient method for time-sharing the processes of social bonding and that language uniquely fulfills this requirement.
Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes
TLDR
This study combines data on human grouping patterns in a comprehensive and systematic study and identifies a discrete hierarchy of group sizes with a preferred scaling ratio close to three, which could reflect a hierarchical processing of social nearness by human brains.
Perspective-taking and memory capacity predict social network size
CO-EVOLUTION OF NEOCORTEX SIZE , GROUP SIZE AND LANGUAGE IN HUMANS
TLDR
It is suggested that language evolved to allow individuals to learn about the behavioural characteristics of other group members more rapidly than is possible by direct observation alone.
Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure
TLDR
It is demonstrated that quantitative variation in the number of friends an individual declares on a web-based social networking service reliably predicted grey matter density in the right superior temporal sulcus, left middle temporal gyrus and entorhinal cortex, previously implicated in social perception and associative memory.
The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms
Social cognition on the Internet: testing constraints on social network size
  • Robin I. M. Dunbar
  • Psychology
    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • 2012
TLDR
Although the recency of SNSs means that there have been relatively few studies, those that are available suggest that the ability to broadcast to many individuals at once, and the possibilities this provides in terms of continuously updating the authors' understanding of network members’ behaviour and thoughts, do not allow larger networks to be maintained.
Processing power limits social group size: computational evidence for the cognitive costs of sociality
TLDR
It is shown that successive increases in the kinds of information processed allow organisms to break through the glass ceilings that otherwise limit the size of social groups: larger groups can only be achieved at the cost of more sophisticated kinds ofInformation processing that are disadvantageous when optimal group size is small.
...
...