The Shrunken Docket of the Rehnquist Court

@article{Hellman1996TheSD,
  title={The Shrunken Docket of the Rehnquist Court},
  author={Arthur D. Hellman},
  journal={The Supreme Court Review},
  year={1996},
  volume={1996},
  pages={403 - 438}
}
From 1971 through 1988, the United States Supreme Court was hearing and deciding about 150 cases each Term. Since the mid-1990s, however, the number of plenary decisions each Term has generally ranged between 75 and 85. How can we explain the shrunken docket? To answer that question, we must identify the changes that have taken place in the cases selected for plenary review and analyze them in a systematic fashion. In this article, I compare the composition of the plenary docket during the… 
The Most Dangerous Justice Rides Again: Revisiting the Power Pageant of the Justices
Who is the most powerful Supreme Court Justice? In 1996 we measured voting power on the Court according to each Justice's ability to form five-member coalitions. From the set of all coalitions formed
The Lottery Docket
We propose supplementing the Supreme Court’s caseload with a “lottery docket” of cases selected at random from final judgments of the circuit courts. The Court currently possesses almost unfettered
Institutional Process, Agenda Setting, and the Development of Election Law on the Supreme Court
The burgeoning commentary on the two important election law cases, Randall v. Sorrell and LULAC v. Perry, decided by the Roberts Court at the end of the 2005 Term, has paid relatively little
Revisiting and Confronting the Federal Judiciary Capacity 'Crisis': Charting a Path for Federal Judiciary Reform
The modern federal judiciary was established well over a century ago by the Judiciary Act of 1891. Over the next 70 years, the structure and core functioning of the judiciary largely remained
An Empirical Study of Supreme Court Justice Pre-Appointment Experience
This study compares the years of experience that preceded appointment to the Supreme Court for each Justice. The study seeks to demonstrate that the background experiences of the Roberts Court
Three Essays in Law and Economics Three Essays in Law and Economics
The first chapter presents a model of legal interpretation in a hierarchical court. Using a two-level court in which judges have spatial preferences over doctrine, the model examines how appeals,
The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government
What role do courts play in the establishment and maintenance of constitutional democracies? To address this question, we elaborate a model that draws on existing substantive literature and on
A Capital Waste of Time? Examining the Supreme Court's 'Culture of Death'
In a lecture at the University of Chicago, U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer highlighted that he has two jobs: the first job, he explained, is deciding what to decide, and the
Efficiency Increased? The Effect of the Case Selections Act of 1988 on Abortion Case Processing Efficiency
Did the Case Selections Act of 1988 (the Act) reduce the time the Supreme Court takes to process abortion cases? In 1988, Congress passed legislation, which eliminated most of the Court’s mandatory
Is a Lower Caseload the Same as a Lower Workload?: Opinion Characteristics of the Burger and Rehnquist Courts
Under Chief Justice Burger, efforts to reduce the demands on the justices were offen predicated on the claim that the Court was overworked and therefore not able to per form its job adequately. The
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-2 OF 2 REFERENCES
91 Harv L Rev at 1718 (cited in note 1) (quoting Supreme Court Justices). 72Allis-Chalmers Corp. v Lueck
  • 1985
The Supreme Court's New Rules-Model
  • 1995