• Corpus ID: 153015328

The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution: Judicial Competence and Independence in the United Kingdom

@inproceedings{Masterman2010TheSO,
  title={The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution: Judicial Competence and Independence in the United Kingdom},
  author={Roger Masterman},
  year={2010}
}
Roger Masterman examines the dividing lines between the powers of the judicial branch of government and those of the executive and legislative branches in the light of two of the most significant constitutional reforms of recent years: the Human Rights Act (1998) and Constitutional Reform Act (2005). Both statutes have implications for the separation of powers within the United Kingdom constitution. The Human Rights Act brings the judges into much closer proximity with the decisions of… 
The Politics of Judicial Independence in the UK's Changing Constitution
Judicial independence is generally understood as requiring that judges must be insulated from political life. The central claim of this work is that far from standing apart from the political realm,
The judicial review of legislation in the United Kingdom: a public choice analysis
The Human Rights Act 1998 unprecedentedly enabled the senior courts in the United Kingdom to review parliamentary enactments for compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights. This
Human rights and global constitutionalism
This thesis examines the contributions to the global constitutional process made by the human rights machinery of the United Nations. To do this, it considers the philosophical and theoretical
Contemporary constitutionalism and the dialectic of constituent power
Abstract This article examines the changing status of constituent power in contemporary constitutionalism. It considers how, at face value, contemporary constitutional law reflects a post-constituent
Measuring the Judicial Power of Regions: A Judicial Regional Authority Index
Due to its special political nature, the attention given to high court selection processes has tended to focus either on the selection process itself and on the relationship and tensions between
To Justifie the Wayes of God to Men : Limits to the court's powers of interpretation
It has long been claimed in academic discussion that it should be possible for public interest organizations to initiate legal proceedings directly at an EU level. However, so it is argued, the only
NARROWING FOREIGN AFFAIRS NON-JUSTICIABILITY
  • Marcus Teo
  • Law
    International and Comparative Law Quarterly
  • 2021
Abstract The UK Supreme Court's decision in Belhaj v Straw defined foreign affairs non-justiciability and unearthed its constitutional foundations. However, two decisions since Belhaj—High
Implementing a Circle of Accountability: A Proposed Framework for Judiciaries and Other Actors in Enforcing Health-Related Rights
As more states incorporate health-related rights into their national constitutions, judges are increasingly being asked to enforce access to entitlements as well as to regulate the conduct of
Pakistan’s National Accountability Ordinance and the facilitation of corrupt practices
  • Z. Ali
  • Political Science
    Contemporary South Asia
  • 2019
ABSTRACT Pakistan’s progress toward full democracy is dependent upon many variables. One major obstacle to establishment of a mature democracy is widespread corruption, which penetrates deep into the
A Theory of Deference in Administrative Law: Basis, Application and Scope
1. Defining deference 2. The delegation argument 3. The practical justifications for curial deference 4. Variable standards of review 5. Deference, proportionality and fundamental rights 6.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 99 REFERENCES
Constitutional reform in the United Kingdom : practice and principles
The Labour Government's proposals for reform of the UK's internal constitutional arrangements promise the most wide-ranging and substantial overhaul of the constitution this century. Their
Rights Protection Without Judicial Supremacy: A Review of the Canadian and British Models of Bills of Rights
Since the enactment of the Human Rights Act UK (1998), Australia is the only common law country without a comprehensive system of legislative or constitutional protection of human rights and
Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy
© Richard Bellamy and Cambridge University Press, 2007. Judicial review by constitutional courts is often presented as a necessary supplement to democracy. This book questions its effectiveness and
Law, Liberty, and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism
The book makes a fresh appraisal of the main principles of constitutional law, seeking to stimulate renewed debate about the fundamentals of British constitutionalism. Rejecting a purely fromal
Judicial Power and the Charter: Canada and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism
Acknowledgements. Introduction. Part I: Judicial Review and Constitutional Interpretation. 1: Judicial Review and the Paradox of Liberal Constitutionalism. 2: The Dimensions of Constitutional
Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution
A year after the publication of Dicey's LAW OF THE CONSTITUTION, William Gladstone was reading it aloud in the House of Commons, citing it as authority. It remains, to this day, a starting point for
Constitutional Law, Administrative Law and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction
PART I: THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES 1. Defining the constitution? 2. Parliamentary sovereignty 3. The rule of law and the separation of powers 4. The Royal prerogative PART II: THE INSTITUTIONS AND
DO CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTIONS BIND
C ONSTITUTIONAL conventions are to be found in political and legal systems of very different types. Not surprisingly, they exist in considerable abundance in those systems—the prime example is the
The English Judges: Their Role in the Changing Constitution
This is the paperback edition of Robert Stevens' acclaimed study of the English Judiciary from an historical perspective, with especial reference to its changing role in the 20th Century. Though the
The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review
This Essay states the general case against judicial review of legislation clearly and in a way that is uncluttered by discussions of particular decisions or the history of its emergence in particular
...
...