The Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory: Development and Psychometric Evaluation

@article{Matarese2019TheSI,
  title={The Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory: Development and Psychometric Evaluation},
  author={Maria Matarese and Marco Clari and Maria Grazia De Marinis and Claudio Barbaranelli and Dhurata Ivziku and Michela Piredda and Barbara Riegel},
  journal={Evaluation \& the Health Professions},
  year={2019},
  volume={43},
  pages={50 - 62}
}
This study developed two instruments, the Self-Care in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Inventory (SC-COPDI) and the COPD-Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale (SCES), and tested their psychometric properties on a convenience sample of 498 patients from Northern, Central, and Southern Italy. First, the domains and the items of the SC-SCOPDI were generated based on the middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness, comprising the dimensions of self-care maintenance, self-care… 

Tables from this paper

[Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of Self-Care Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory (SC-COPD) and Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale (SCES-COPD)].

  • J. ChoiS. Yun
  • Medicine, Psychology
    Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing
  • 2022
The Korean version of SC-COPDI and SCES-CopD are valid and reliable instruments for measuring selfcare in people with COPD and can be used in self-care studies of COPD patients in Korea.

Validity and Reliability of Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory and Caregiver Self-Efficacy in Contributing to Self-Care Scale.

The study tested the construct validity and reliability of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Inventory and the Caregiver Self-Efficacy in

Psychometric Testing of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3.0.

The authors' testing suggests that the SC-CHDI v3.0 is a sound measure of the essential elements of self-care for adults with coronary heart disease.

Measuring self-care in the general adult population: development and psychometric testing of the Self-Care Inventory

Preliminary evidence of validity and reliability supports the SCI, a theoretically based instrument designed to measure self-care in the general adult population, in use in this group.

Reply to Comment on: Self-Care Evaluation in COPD

This study demonstrates the reciprocal influence of psychological distress in patients and family caregivers and designed the SC-COPDI to be a conceptually clear and focused measurement of self-care behaviors with strong validity in measuring effective self- care.

Cross-cultural assessment of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory: A psychometric evaluation.

Comment On: Self-Care Evaluation in COPD

The authors in this case developed an instrument to assess patients’ confidence in their ability to perform disease-related self-care, and were disappointed to see that theSelf-care evaluation instrument did not include psychological measures.

Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Assessing Self-Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Review

Clinicians and researchers should consider the psychometric properties of self-efficacy PROMs in clinical practice or research and choose the appropriate outcome measure based on the purpose.

Psychometric Testing of the Self-care of Hypertension Inventory Version 3.0

Initial testing suggests that the SC-HI v3.0 is a sound measure of the essential elements of self-care for adults with chronic hypertension and is a valid reflection of the theory on which it is based.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 67 REFERENCES

Development and Validation of a COPD Self-Management Scale

The CSMS is the first dedicated scale for evaluating the self-management status of COPD patients, and will serve as an important instrument for assessing and improving theSelf-management of COPd patients, particularly, those in the Hunan region of China.

Development and initial testing of the self‐care of chronic illness inventory

The self-care of chronic illness inventory is adequate in reliability and validity and is suggested for further testing in diverse populations of patients with chronic illnesses.

Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test

The aim of the present study was to develop a short validated patient-completed questionnaire, the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), assessing the impact of COPD on health status, which has good measurement properties, is sensitive to differences in state and should provide a valid, reliable and standardised measure of COPd health status with worldwide relevance.

Development and psychometric testing of a theory-based tool to measure self-care in diabetes patients: the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory

The SCODI is a valid and reliable theoretically-grounded tool to measure self-care in type 1 and type 2 DM patients and was a significant predictor of self- care maintenance, monitoring and management.

Family support, perceived self-efficacy and self-care behaviour of Turkish patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The results of the study demonstrated weak to moderate, but statistically significant, relationships between family support and self-care behaviours, self-efficacy andSelf-care behaviour and family supportand self- efficacy in Turkish patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Self-Care of People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-Synthesis

This meta-synthesis provides evidence on the self-care behaviours and strategies that people with COPD perform to prevent, control and manage the physical, psychological and social consequences of the disease.

The COPD Self-Efficacy Scale.

A 34-item COPD Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES) is developed to assess self-efficacy in individuals afflicted with COPD and has good test-retest reliability, excellent internal consistency, and a five-factor structure.

Self management for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The primary outcomes of the review were health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and number of hospital admissions and heterogeneity among interventions and controls revealed no statistically significant differences between studies with and without exercise programmes.
...