The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change

@article{Oreskes2004TheSC,
  title={The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change},
  author={Naomi Oreskes},
  journal={Science},
  year={2004},
  volume={306},
  pages={1686 - 1686}
}
Policy-makers and the public who are not members of the relevant research community have had to form opinions about the reality of global climate change on the basis of often conflicting descriptions provided by the media regarding the level of scientific certainty attached to studies of climate. In this Essay, Oreskes analyzes the existing scientific literature to show that there is a robust consensus that anthropogenic global climate change is occurring. Thus, despite claims sometimes made… Expand
Geographies of Climate Change Belief
Despite scientific consensus on the anthropogenic causation of climate change, and evergrowing knowledge on the biophysical impacts of climate change, there is large variability in public perceptionsExpand
Anthropogenic climate change : expert credibility and the scientific consensus
Any attempt to offer an overview of the climate science literature is bound to be controversial; the best known attempts are no exception. Here, we outline the methods and findings of the mostExpand
Speaking with one voice for climate science — climate researchers' opinion on the consensus policy of the IPCC
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) proceeds on the assumption that scientific consensus is a tool for successful climate communication. While ‘speaking with one voice’ hasExpand
History and future of the scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming
The article by Cook et al offers an interesting new methodological approach to the debate about (supposedly lacking) scientific consensus on global warming, showing that contrarian claims that thereExpand
Expert credibility in climate change
TLDR
An extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data is used to show that 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Expand
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the literature: A re-analysis
A claim has been that 97% of the scientific literature endorses anthropogenic climate change (Cook et al., 2013. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024024). This claim, frequently repeated in debates aboutExpand
Climate scientists need to set the record straight: There is a scientific consensus that human‐caused climate change is happening
Nearly all climate scientists are convinced that human-caused climate change is occurring, yet half of Americans do not know or do not believe that a scientific consensus has been reached. That suchExpand
The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists
The existence of anthropogenic climate change remains a public controversy despite the consensus among climate scientists. The controversy may be fed by the existence of scientists from otherExpand
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong?
In 1995, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change announced that anthropogenic climate change had become discernible. Since then, numerous independent studies have affirmed that anthropogenicExpand
The scientific consensus of climate change revisited
Abstract This paper first reviews previous work undertaken to assess the level of scientific consensus concerning climate change, concluding that studies of scientific consensus concerning climateExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-2 OF 2 REFERENCES
The oil industry and climate change: strategies and ethical dilemmas
This paper explores the different climate change strategies chosen by three major multinational oil corporations: ExxonMobil, TotalFinaElf and BP Amoco. They are referred to, as the 'fight againstExpand
Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability
Foreword Preface Introduction Summary for policymakers Technical summary 1. Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems 2. New assessment methodologies and theExpand