The Science of Elections

  title={The Science of Elections},
  author={Steven J. Brams and Dudley R Herschbach},
  pages={1449 - 1449}
I t comes as a surprise to some that there is a science of elections. Its provenance can be traced back to the Marquis de Condorcet in 18th-century France, Charles Dodgson (Lewis Carroll) in 19th-century England, and Kenneth Arrow in 20th-century America. Since Arrow published his seminal book Social Choice and Individual Values 50 years ago—for which in large part he received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics in 1972—there have been thousands of articles and hundreds of books published on… Expand
Going from theory to practice: the mixed success of approval voting
Ballot data from some of the societies that adopted AV are used to compare theoretical results with experience, including the nature of voting under AV and the kinds of candidates that are elected. Expand
Solving hard problems in election systems
This work evaluates the complexity, both theoretically and empirically, of manipulating, bribing, and controlling elections, particularly on scoring protocols, and shows how certain parameters and properties of scoring protocols can make elections easy or hard to manipulate. Expand
The Complexity of Manipulating k-Approval Elections
This work takes the first step in generalizing the results of computational complexity of election misuse to cases of infinitely many scoring protocols on an unbounded number of candidates and demonstrates a surprising connection between manipulation in election systems and some graph theory problems. Expand
Tactical Voting in Plurality Elections
This work identifies tactical voting as the driving ingredient for the anomalies and introduces a model to study its effect on plurality elections, characterized by the relative strength of the feedback from polls and the pairwise interaction between individuals in the society. Expand
Chapter 4 Voting procedures
This work discusses broad classes of social choice functions as well as special cases such as plurality rule, approval voting, and Borda's point-count method for voting procedures for two-candidate elections. Expand
If you like the alternative vote (a.k.a. the instant runoff), then you ought to know about the Coombs rule
Abstract We consider four factors relevant to picking a voting rule to be used to select a single candidate from among a set of choices: (1) avoidance of Condorcet losers, (2) choice of CondorcetExpand
The interplay of self-reflection, social interaction and random events in the dynamics of opinion flow in two-party democracies
We propose a continuous process opinion formation model to study the dynamics of a multi-level relationship between voters, political parties, and facts in two-party democratic elections. In ourExpand
A geometric model of sensitivity of multistage elections to change
This paper geometrically compares multistage, multiple, and positional elections and shows that multiple stage elections are not necessarily more sensitive to small scale manipulation or other small scale effects. Expand
Approval voting and positional voting methods: Inference, relationship, examples
This work extends the inference framework of Tsetlin and Regenwetter (2003) from majority rule to approval voting and all positional voting methods and finds that, under certain statistical assumptions, approval voting tends to agree with positional Voting methods, and with Borda, in particular. Expand
Technologies for political representation and accountability
Electronic voting is gaining momentum and we can expect several countries in the near future developing the digital infrastructure and legal codes to realize a secure and automated ballot system. TheExpand