The Role of Patients: Shared Decision-Making.

  title={The Role of Patients: Shared Decision-Making.},
  author={Emily H. Beers and Marci Lee Nilsen and Jonas T. Johnson},
  journal={Otolaryngologic clinics of North America},
  volume={50 4},

Tables from this paper

What's the Role of Time in Shared Decision Making?
Time as a barrier to shared decision making, alternative ways clinicians can think about time, and steps they can take to have fulfilling SDM interactions despite time constraints are explored.
Decision-making by cancer patients and the role of a counselling facility for complementary and alternative medicine: a cohort study
C counselling on CAM encourages patients to engage in shared decision-making and increases patient’s satisfaction with decisions, and enables patients to transfer these competences also to decisions on conventional medicine.
The Shared Decision-Making Process in the Pharmacological Management of Depression
  • Malcom Hopwood
  • Medicine, Psychology
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
  • 2019
The purpose of the present article is to examine the importance of SDM in the management of healthcare with a focus on mental health, and reviews the enablers and barriers (and how to overcome them) to implementing a SDM process in psychiatric practice.
Patient perspectives on treatment decision-making under clinical uncertainty: chemotherapy treatment decisions among stage II colon cancer patients.
Patient perspectives indicate provider inconsistency in communicating ACT harms, benefits, and uncertainties, and poor elicitation of patient preferences and values, which indicate a notable gap in understanding for decisions made using SDM models in the context of clinical uncertainty.
Towards Culturally Sensitive Shared Decision-Making in Oncology A Study Protocol Integrating Bioethical Qualitative Research on Shared Decision-Making Among Ethnic Minorities With Ethical Reflection
If there is a need for adaptation of the current SDM model to ethnic minorities and to formulate possible adjustments, the Reflective Equilibrium will be used to develop a coherent view on the application of SDM among ethnic minorities in oncology.
Moral-uncertainty-distress related to Advance Directives: a qualitative study
Although AD were comprehended as instruments of exercise of patient’s autonomy by the participants, some elements were morally challenging for them, which can be a source of MUD to physician during decision making process.
Talking about treatment benefits, harms, and what matters to patients in radiation oncology: an observational study
BackgroundShared decision making is associated with improved patient outcomes in radiation oncology. Our study aimed to capture how shared decision-making practices–namely, communicating potential
Off the Beaten Path: Caring for People Engaging in Potentially Unsafe Low Evidence Therapies.
The definition of PULETs is reviewed, a framework to evaluate the relative risk/benefit ratio of such therapies is reviewed followed by a review of the ethical and legal aspects of care and a communication approach is presented to foster continued collaboration and care for patients who engage in PuleTs.


Has patients’ involvement in the decision‐making process changed over time?
Objective  To get insight into the changes over time of patients’ involvement in the decision‐making process, and into the factors contributing to patients’ involvement and general practitioners’
Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
A model of how to do shared decision making that is based on choice, option and decision talk is proposed that is practical, easy to remember, and can act as a guide to skill development.
The Ideal of Shared Decision Making Between Physicians and Patients
  • D. Brock
  • Medicine
    Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal
  • 1991
The physician's role is to use his or her training, knowledge, and experience to provide the patient with facts about the diagnosis and about the prognoses without treatment and with alternative treatments, which seems to assume that the physician can and should provide the facts about treatment alternatives in a value-neutral form.
Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.
The most important attribute of patient-centered care is the active engagement of patients when fateful health care decisions must be made — when they arrive at a crossroads of medical options, where
International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS): beyond decision aids to usual design of patient education materials
  • M. Holmes-Rovner
  • Medicine
    Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
  • 2007
An international collaboration recently reported a set of criteria for judging a good DA, aimed at improving quality of DAs, which I believe represent important research-based principles to guide design of patient education materials.
Meeting the decision-making preferences of patients with breast cancer in oncology consultations: impact on decision-related outcomes.
Patients' ultimate involvement preferences were more likely to be consistent with the way the decision was actually made, suggesting that patients need to feel concordance between their preference and the actual decision.
Congruence between patients’ preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature
This review suggests that a similar approach to all patients is not likely to meet patients’ wishes, since preferences for participation vary among patients, and health care professionals should be sensitive to patients individual preferences.
Decision making at a time of crisis near the end of life.
Physicians can best help patients decide which treatments are appropriate by taking the necessary time to explore all curative and palliative care options, providing honest and timely prognostic information, making clear recommendations, facilitating patient-family discussions, and affirming patient choices.
Not all patients want to participate in decision making
It is demonstrated that people vary substantially in their preferences for participation in decision making and Physicians and health care organizations should not assume that patients wish to participate in clinical decision making, but must assess individual patient preferences and tailor care accordingly.