The Revivalism of Narrative: A Response to Recent Criticisms of Quantitative History

  title={The Revivalism of Narrative: A Response to Recent Criticisms of Quantitative History},
  author={J. Morgan Kousser},
  journal={Social Science History},
  pages={133 - 149}
  • J. M. Kousser
  • Published 21 January 1984
  • History
  • Social Science History
In his presidential address to the Social Science History Association Convention in November 1981, Robert William Fogel declared sanguinely that social scientific historians had won their battle for legitimacy within the historical profession in America, and that we should now stop feeling embattled, spend less effort proselytizing, and calmly go on with our substantive work. While his statistics on the occupational advancement of social scientific historians do indicate a degree of acceptance… 

Reflections on an Old “New History” Quantitative Social Science History in Postmodern Middle Age

Not very long ago quantitative historians were on the offensive. Only a decade back the eminent “Annales School” French historian Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie stated in the English language translation of

Quantitative German History in the United States and the United Kingdom

What has happened to quantitative history? Is it dead? Any working historian alive today in the English-speaking world surely knows that it has come under heavy attack at least since Lawrence Stone,

Systematic Revisionism and a Generation of Ferment in American History

The earnest veterans who swept into American graduate schools after the conclusion of the second world war were self-confident, mature in judgment, and eager to begin professional careers. Having

Seeking a Quantitative Middle Ground: Reflections on Methods and Opportunities in Economic History

Historical research into economic topics is booming: The history of capitalism is on the march, Atlantic and Pacific histories have invigorated research on trade and merchants, and environmental

The Shock of the “‘New’ (Histories)”

  • H. Graff
  • Sociology
    Social Science History
  • 2001
At this meeting, we celebrate 25 years of the Social Science History Association, the SSHA.With appreciation from all of us, I acknowledge the achievements of our founders and our long-time members.

Is History a Process? Nonlinearity, Revitalization Theory, and the Central Metaphor of Social Science History

  • R. Roth
  • Sociology
    Social Science History
  • 1992
Process is a ubiquitous word in social science history. It appears dozens of times in such fundamental texts as Wallace 1969, Hershberg 1969, and Wolf 1982. Social science historians generally use

What Are Analytic Narratives?

The paper concludes that analytic narratives can usefully complement standard narratives in historical explanation, provided they specialize in the gaps that these narratives reveal and that they are discursively consistent, despite the tension that combining a formal model with a narration creates.

Theory, Method, and Social Reproduction in Social Science History: A Short Jeremiad

Let me begin with a simple theme, repentance, and a simple message: repent from complacency in the practice and defense of social science history (SSH). I say this because I do not see social science

Analytic Narratives: What they are and how they contribute to historical explanation

The expression “analytic narratives” is used to refer to a range of quite recent studies that lie on the boundaries between history, political science, and economics. These studies purport to explain

Cliometric metatheory : the actuarial approach to empirical, history-based philosophy of science

Metatheory is the empirical theory of scientific theorizing. Its descriptive data base is scientific practice, history of science, and the facts of human cognition and communication. «Scientific




Tacitus to Gibbon and Macaulay the composition of narrative in lively and elegant prose was always accounted their highest ambition. History was regarded as a branch of rhetoric. For the last fifty

On Restoring Politics to Political History

If history ever was simply the study of past politics, it is no longer. Dissatisfied with narratives of Great Men, more interested in analyzing the impact of larger forces and in tracing out

History as Past Sociology in the Work of Samuel P. Hays: A Review Essay

This tastefully produced collection of sixteen essays, nearly all published previously, but in widely disparate journals, plus a long autobiographical introduction and a brief epilogue, affords an

A Second Look

Three years ago in this journal, J. Morgan Kousser( 1977) offered a stunning challenge to historians—a program for significantly improving the quantitative competence of historians and for expanding

The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789

The first book to appear in the illustrious Oxford History of the United States, this critically acclaimed volume-a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize-offers an unsurpassed history of the Revolutionary

Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe.

Since its initial publication in 1973, Hayden White's Metahistory has remained an essential book for understanding the nature of historical writing. In this classic work, White argues that a deep

American Constitutional History and the New Legal History: Complementary Themes in Two Modes

The approaching bicentennial of the Constitution promises to stimulate interest in scholarship on the history of American law. This prospect coincides with what many practitioners of constitutional

Population and History

In the German Ideology, Marx and Engels attribute early social evolution to “increased productivity, the increase of needs, and, what is fundamental to both of these, the increase ofpopulation.”*They

History QUASSHed

History is different from the other social sciences. Nine contrasting qualities have produced a striking variation between the course of development of quantitative methods in history and that in

The "New Political History": A Methodological Critique

In a recent review article one of the leading figures of the "new political history," Samuel P. Hays, argued that "a preoccupation with technique" on the part of both critics and defenders of the