• DOI:10.3386/w25638
• Corpus ID: 159219050

The Return to Protectionism

@article{Fajgelbaum2019TheRT,
  title={The Return to Protectionism},
  author={Pablo D. Fajgelbaum and Pinelopi Koujianou Goldberg and Patrick Joseph Kennedy and Amit K. Khandelwal},
  journal={ERN: Fiscal Policy Objectives; Policy Designs; Policy Coordination (Topic)},
  year={2019}
}

• Pablo D. Fajgelbaum, P. Goldberg, +1 author A. Khandelwal
• Published 1 March 2019
• Economics
• ERN: Fiscal Policy Objectives; Policy Designs; Policy Coordination (Topic)

After decades of supporting free trade, in 2018 the U.S. raised import tariffs and major trade partners retaliated. We analyze the short-run impact of this return to protectionism on the U.S. economy. Import and retaliatory tariffs caused large declines in imports and exports. Prices of imports targeted by tariffs did not fall, implying complete pass-through of tariffs to duty-inclusive prices. The resulting losses to U.S. consumers and firms who buy imports was $51 billion, or 0.27% of GDP. We embed the estimated trade elasticities in a general-equilibrium model of the U.S. economy. After accounting for tariff revenue and gains to domestic producers, the aggregate real income loss was $7.2 billion, or 0.04% of GDP. Import tariffs favored sectors concentrated in politically competitive counties, and the model implies that tradeable-sector workers in heavily Republican counties were the most negatively affected due to the retaliatory tariffs.