• DOI:10.1111/GOVE.12161
• Corpus ID: 143427109

The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability

@article{Busuioc2016TheRB,
  title={The Reputational Basis of Public Accountability},
  author={E. Madalina Busuioc and Martin Lodge},
  journal={Governance},
  year={2016},
  volume={29},
  pages={247-263}
}

• E. Busuioc, M. Lodge
• Published 1 April 2016
• Political Science
• Governance

This article proposes a reputation‐based approach to account for two core puzzles of accountability. The first is the misfit between behavioral predictions of the hegemonic political science framework for talking about accountability, namely, principal–agent, and empirical findings. The second puzzle is the unrivaled popularity of accountability, given evidence that supposedly accountability‐enhancing measures often lead to opposite effects. A “reputation‐informed” theoretical approach to public accountability suggests that accountability is not about reducing informational asymmetries, containing “drift,” or ensuring that agents stay committed to the terms of their mandate. Accountability—in terms of both holding and giving—is about managing and cultivating one's reputation vis‐a‐vis different audiences. It is about being seen as a reputable actor in the eyes of one's audience(s), conveying the impression of competently performing one's (accountability) roles, thereby generating reputational benefits.