The Relationship of Reliability and Validity of Personality Tests to Frame-of-Reference Instructions and Within-Person Inconsistency

@article{Reddock2011TheRO,
  title={The Relationship of Reliability and Validity of Personality Tests to Frame-of-Reference Instructions and Within-Person Inconsistency},
  author={Craig M. Reddock and M. Biderman and N. Nguyen},
  journal={Wiley-Blackwell: International Journal of Selection \& Assessment},
  year={2011}
}
The efficacy of both frame-of-reference (FOR) instructions and a measure of within-person inconsistency in predicting grade point average was investigated. The IPIP Big Five personality questionnaire was given to 329 students with generic instructions and at school FOR instructions. The Wonderlic Personnel Test was also administered. A measure of within-person inconsistency was created based on the standard deviations of responses to items within the same Big Five dimension. The validity of… Expand
The relationship of scale reliability and validity to respondent inconsistency
Abstract The generalizability of respondent inconsistency and of its relationship to estimates of the reliability and validity of personality measures was examined. Two hundred and six undergraduatesExpand
Item‐Level Frame‐Of‐Reference Effects in Personality Testing: An Investigation of Incremental Validity in an Organizational Setting
A recent line of research has investigated the frame-of-reference effect on personality scale scores, in which self-report personality items are contextualized to the specific performance settingExpand
A matter of context: A meta‐analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures.
The empirical evidence that has accumulated in support of the notion that personality is a valid predictor of employee performance is vast, yet debate on the matter continues. This study investigatesExpand
Intraindividual personality change: Situational influences, patterns of change, and frequency-based measurement
A large amount of research supports the idea that little change in personality occurs over time (e.g., Caspi & Roberts, 2001). However, changes in an individual’s personality across differentExpand
A Comparison of General and Work‐Specific Personality Measures as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship Behavior
The current study compared general and work‐specific measures of personality as predictors of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Consistent with the literature on frame‐of‐reference effectsExpand
On Being the Same in Different Places: Evaluating Frame-of-Reference Effects Across Two Social Contexts.
TLDR
Standard NEO-FFI self-Ratings generally showed higher self-informant agreement with both types of informants than contextualized self-ratings, which suggests that validity is enhanced more by specific trait- informant combinations than by the contextualization of items to social contexts. Expand
Enhancing the Predictive Potential of Personality: Isolating Multiple Components of Trait Expression via a Single Administration Design
Abstract : Decades of research support that people behave differently in different situations. The focus of this research was on advancing the measurement of personality by more careful ofExpand
Personality dynamics at work: The effects of form, time, and context of variability
The study aimed to investigate the status of within-person state variability in neuroticism and conscientiousness as individual differences constructs by exploring their (a) temporal stability, (b)Expand
Item context effects on Big Five personality measures
Item specificity and contextual cues are one of the potential sources of measurement error in personality measures. The term frame of reference represents an implicit or explicit context that affectsExpand
Inter-individual differences in intra-individual variability in personality within and across contexts
This study focuses on intra-individual variability in personality at work, and how it relates to job performance. 288 professionals completed contextualised adjective-based personality assessments inExpand
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity.
Increased use of personality inventories in employee selection has led to concerns regarding factors that influence the validity of such measures. A series of studies was conducted to examine theExpand
A closer look at the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores and validity.
TLDR
This article contributes to the understanding of why the use of a frame-of-reference leads to increased criterion-related validity of personality inventories by providing an explanation for the moderate validities of generic Personality inventories. Expand
A field study of frame-of-reference effects on personality test validity.
TLDR
The authors tested the effects of providing an "at work" frame-of-reference on the validity of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory among a sample of customer service supervisors and found that frame- of-reference moderated the legitimacy of the Extraversion and Openness to Experience subscales after controlling for cognitive ability. Expand
Incremental validity of the frame-of-reference effect in personality scale scores: a replication and extension.
TLDR
The results indicate that context-specific personality items do indeed obtain incremental validity above and beyond both noncontextual items and cognitive ability, and in spite of socially desirable responding induced by applicant instructions. Expand
Testing the Rules of Justice: The Effects of Frame-of-Reference and Pre-Test Validity Information on Personality Test Responses and Test Perceptions
The resurgence of personality tests in selection has sparked interest in factors that may increase the utility and acceptability of these tests. Following a justice framework, the present studyExpand
On the nature of intraindividual personality variability: reliability, validity, and associations with well-being.
TLDR
A new variability index is developed that is reliable and valid and can predict actual changes in self-reports over time, and once mean-level variance is removed, intraindividual variability is no longer related to well-being. Expand
Metatraits: Enhancing Criterion‐Related Validity Through the Assessment of Traitedness1
With the growing use of personality tests as predictors of job performance, the reliable measurement of these personality variables has become important to selection researchers and practitioners.Expand
Beyond alpha: an empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs.
TLDR
The authors conclude that transient error exists in all 3 trait domains and is especially large in the domain of affective traits. Expand
An examination and evaluation of frequency-based personality measurement
Abstract This study assessed the efficacy of using a frequency-based response format as a unique alternative to traditional Likert-type response formats to obtain a measure of temporal stability onExpand
IN SUPPORT OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT IN ORGANIZATIONAL SETTINGS
Personality constructs have been demonstrated to be useful for explaining and predicting attitudes, behaviors, performance, and outcomes in organizational settings. Many professionally developedExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...