The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic

@article{Johnson1999TheRB,
  title={The Relation between Formal and Informal Logic},
  author={Ralph H. Johnson},
  journal={Argumentation},
  year={1999},
  volume={13},
  pages={265-274}
}
The issue of the relationship between formal and informal logic depends strongly on how one understands these two designations. While there is very little disagreement about the nature of formal logic, the same is not true regarding informal logic, which is understood in various (often incompatible) ways by various thinkers. After reviewing some of the more prominent conceptions of informal logic, I will present my own, defend it and then show how informal logic, so understood, is complementary… 

Wittgenstein´s influence on the development of informal logic

The perception exists that Wittgenstein was influential in the development of informal logic. That perception is probably based on several beliefs. One is the belief that Wittgenstein influenced some

Some axioms underlying argumentation theory

This paper examines whether philosophers of argument, in spite of their disavowing ‘timeless principles’, nevertheless embrace a set of principles, or axioms, to underlie argumentation theory. First,

Introduction: The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation--A Map

An overview of the epistemological approach to argumentation, explaining what it is, justifying it as better than a rhetorical or a consensual ist approach. systematizing the main directions and

Dialogues as a Dynamic Framework for Logic

Dialogical logic is a game-theoretical approach to logic. Logic is studied with the help of certain games, which can be thought of as idealized argumentations. Two players, the Proponent, who puts

The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation - A Map

This contribution gives an overview of the epistemological approach to argumentation. It explains what an 'epistemological approach to argumentation' is, and justifies this approach as being better

On How to Be a Dialogician

TLDR
The aim here will be to present the main technical and philosophical features of what can be seen as the dialogical approach to logic, illustrated through both very well known and new dialogics, and delineate the common pragmatic attitude which constitutes the cohesive force within the dialogicals universe.

Humanist Principles Underlying Philosophy of Argument

This discussion reviews the thinking of some prominent philosophers of argument to extract principles common to their thinking. It shows that a growing concern with dialogical pragmatics is better

Subordinating Truth – Is Acceptability Acceptable?

Argumentation logicians have recognized a specter of relativism to haunt their philosophy of argument. However, their attempts to dispel pernicious relativism by invoking notions of a universal

What a Real Argument Is

: In “What is a ‘Real’ Argument?” Geoff Goddu (2009) suggests and rejects four candidates for what a real argument is, concluding that argumentation theorists should abandon the idea that there is a

The Value of Genetic Fallacies

Since at least the 1938 publication of Hans Reichenbach’s Experience and Predication, there has been widespread agreement that, when discussing the beliefs that people have, it is important to

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES

Fundamentals of logic

TLDR
This course serves as an introduction to formal logic by learning a formal language for sentential (propositional) and predicate logic, and how to “translate” English sentences into sentences in the formal language, and vice versa.

Historical Foundations of Informal Logic

Contents: Introduction The logic of Greek sophistry The roots of informal logic in Plato Aristotle and informal logic Forms of argumentation in medieval dialectic The Port Royal Logic The Logick of

Informal Logic and the Theory of Reasoning

Informal logic seems to be suffering from an image problem, a bad conscience, and an identity crisis. The image problem derives from the somewhat negative connotations of the term "informal," which

Informal logic : the first international symposium

TLDR
This paper will work towards trying to see how what is called petitio principii might be understood as a deficiency in arguments, and how this theory should be strongly tied to the analysis of significant arguments.

New Essays In Informal Logic

This book is a collection of essays based on papers presented at the Third International Symposium on Informal Logic held at the University of Windsor in June, 1989. The essays are almost without

The uses of argument

Preface Introduction 1. Fields of argument and modals 2. Probability 3. The layout of arguments 4. Working logic and idealised logic 5. The origins of epistemological theory Conclusion References

Teaching Argumentation Analysis and Critical Thinking in the Netherlands. Resource Publication, Series 2 No. 2.

The importance of argumentation analysis may become clear once it is realized that not a day passes without a confrontation, without argument and counter-response. Argumentation is encountered

Epistemology and Cognition

Introduction Part I: Theoretical Foundations 1. The Elements of Epistemology 2. Skepticism 3. Knowledge 4. Justification: A Rule Framework 5. Justification and Reliability 6. Problem Solving, Power,