The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications

@article{Jacobs2021TheQT,
  title={The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications},
  author={Alan M. Jacobs and Tim B{\"u}the and Ana Arjona and Leonardo R. Arriola and Eva Bellin and Andrew Bennett and Lisa Bj{\"o}rkman and Erik Bleich and Zachary Elkins and Tasha Fairfield and Nikhar Gaikwad and Sheena Chestnut Greitens and Mary Hawkesworth and Veronica Herrera and Yoshiko M. Herrera and Kimberley S. Johnson and Ekrem Karakoç and Kendra L. Koivu and Marcus Kreuzer and Milli Lake and Timothy W. Luke and Lauren Morris Maclean and Samantha Majic and Rahsaan Maxwell and Zachariah Cherian Mampilly and Robert W. Mickey and Kimberly J Morgan and Sarah E. Parkinson and Craig A. Parsons and Wendy Pearlman and Mark A. Pollack and Elliot Posner and Rachel Beatty Riedl and Edward Schatz and Carsten Q. Schneider and Jillian Schwedler and Anastasia Shesterinina and Erica S. Simmons and Diane Singerman and Hillel David Soifer and Nicholas Rush Smith and Scott J. Spitzer and Jonas Tallberg and Susan Thomson and Antonio Y. V{\'a}zquez-Arroyo and Barbara Vis and Lisa Wedeen and Juliet A. Williams and Elisabeth Jean Wood and Deborah J. Yashar},
  journal={Perspectives on Politics},
  year={2021},
  volume={19},
  pages={171 - 208}
}
In recent years, a variety of efforts have been made in political science to enable, encourage, or require scholars to be more open and explicit about the bases of their empirical claims and, in turn, make those claims more readily evaluable by others. While qualitative scholars have long taken an interest in making their research open, reflexive, and systematic, the recent push for overarching transparency norms and requirements has provoked serious concern within qualitative research… 

Transparency for Text-Based Sources: From Principles to Practice

Debates about transparency standards in social science research often lack specificity, mischaracterize the status quo, or stress the value of replication. These debates frequently talk past each

Ethics, Epistemology, and Openness in Research with Human Participants

The political science discipline has recently engaged in contentious debate about the value of “research transparency,” particularly for research with human participants. The discipline is also

Why Do We Speak to Experts? Reviving the Strength of the Expert Interview Method

In political scientists’ drive to examine causal mechanisms, qualitative expert interviews have an important role to play. This is particularly true for the analysis of complex decision-making

Using Pre-Analysis Plans in Qualitative Research

TLDR
This paper presents a study identifying the main sections that scholars who conduct qualitative research in various disciplines should include in a preregistration template, and suggests that a PAP for qualitative studies (PAP-Q) should include four basic categories of information.

How Annotation for Transparent Inquiry Can Enhance Research Transparency in Qualitative Comparative Analysis

According to the American Political Science Association (APSA 2012, 9) ethics guidelines, “researchers have an ethical obligation to facilitate the evaluation of their evidence-based knowledge claims

The Provenance Problem: Research Methods and Ethics in the Age of WikiLeaks

How should political scientists navigate the ethical and methodological quandaries associated with analyzing leaked classified documents and other nonconsensually acquired sources? Massive

Reflexive Openness as Collaborative Methodology

In2019, I co-published aworking paper titled “Research Ethics and Human Subjects: A Reflexiveness Openness Approach” (MacLean et al. 2019). The essay was the result of a collaborative enterprise,

Precarious Times, Professional Tensions: The Ethics of Migration Research and the Drive for Scientific Accountability

How should migration scholars navigate tensions between our ethical responsibilities to research participants and growing “open science” calls for data transparency, replication, and accountability?

Studying states and regimes in Central Asia: contributions to comparative politics and future challenges

ABSTRACT This article surveys research on regimes and states in Central Asia and assesses its contribution to Political Science, specifically the subfield of comparative politics. It discusses three

Ethnographic Approaches to Contentious Politics: The What, How, and Why

How should we study contentious politics in an era rife with new forms of contention, both in the United States and abroad? The introduction to this special issue draws attention to one particularly

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 103 REFERENCES

Transparency and Integrity in Conducting Field Research on Politics in Challenging Contexts

  • A. Tripp
  • Sociology
    Perspectives on Politics
  • 2018
R esearch, particularly for political scientists who do field research in non-democratic and politically sensitive contexts, has become increasingly onerous due to university oversight procedures,

Data Access and Research Transparency in the Qualitative Tradition

As an abstract idea, openness is difficult to oppose. Social scientists from every research tradition agree that scholars cannot just assert their conclusions, but must also share their evidentiary

For a More Public Political Science

  • J. Isaac
  • Political Science
    Perspectives on Politics
  • 2015
M any scholarly journals contain Editor Introductions designed to furnish brief yet inviting summaries of each issue’s contents. Ever since June 2005, when I became Perspectives Book Review Editor, I

The Rush to Transparency: DA-RT and the Potential Dangers for Qualitative Research

  • K. Monroe
  • Political Science
    Perspectives on Politics
  • 2018
What is the impact of the recent Data Access and Research Transparency (DA-RT) initiative and the Journal Editors Transparency Statement (JETS) on scholars working with qualitative data? Analysis

Legitimizing Political Science or Splitting the Discipline? Reflections on DA-RT and the Policy-making Role of a Professional Association

We have been invited by Politics & Gender's editors to review the origins and current standing of the Data Access and Research Transparency (DA-RT) policy, an effort initiated by the eponymous

Political ethnography : what immersion contributes to the study of power

Scholars of politics have sought in recent years to make the discipline more hospitable to qualitative methods of research. Lauding the results of this effort and highlighting its potential for the

Transparency in Qualitative and Multi-Method Research Introduction to the Symposium

Tim Büthe is Associate Professor of Political Science and Public Policy, as well as a Senior Fellow of the Kenan Institute for Ethics, at Duke University. He is online at buthe@duke.edu and http://

A Dialogue with the Data: The Bayesian Foundations of Iterative Research in Qualitative Social Science

TLDR
It is argued that mechanisms for distinguishing exploratory from confirmatory stages of analysis that have been suggested in the context of APSA’s DA-RT transparency initiative are unnecessary for qualitative research that is guided by logical Bayesianism.

Active Citation: In Search of Smoking Guns or Meaningful Context?

Andrew Moravcsik makes a persuasive case that rigorously executed qualitative methods have a distinctive and indispensable role to play in research on international relations. Qualitative case

Hermeneutics and the Question of Transparency

Andrew Davison Vassar College esis of the data (“production transparency”), and demonstrating the data’s use (“analytical transparency”) are, for the supporters of DA-RT, indispensable for valid,
...