The Psychology of Fake News

@article{Pennycook2021ThePO,
  title={The Psychology of Fake News},
  author={Gordon Pennycook and David G. Rand},
  journal={Trends in Cognitive Sciences},
  year={2021},
  volume={25},
  pages={388-402}
}

Figures from this paper

Could Belief in Fake News Predict Vaccination Behavior in the Elderly?

Willingness to get a vaccine was important during the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies suggest that vaccine hesitation during the pandemic could have been related to truth discernment, belief in

Misinformation about COVID-19: Psychological Insights

Psychological insights are offered to better understanding of what makes people susceptible to believing and sharing misinformation and how this can inform interventions aimed at tackling the issue.

Disinformation Sharing Thrives with Fear of Missing Out among Low Cognitive News Users: A Cross-national Examination of Intentional Sharing of Deep Fakes

ABSTRACT This study investigates the antecedents of advertent (intentional) deepfakes sharing behavior. Data from two countries (US and Singapore) reveal that social media news use and FOMO are

Nudging Social Media toward Accuracy

A limited-attention utility model that is based on a theory about inattention to accuracy on social media and shows how a simple nudge or prompt that shifts attention to accuracy increases the quality of news that people share is described.

Digital literacy is associated with more discerning accuracy judgments but not sharing intentions

It has been widely argued that social media users with low digital literacy—who lack fluency with basic technological concepts related to the internet—are more likely to fall for online

Thinking more or thinking differently? Using drift-diffusion modeling to illuminate why accuracy prompts decrease misinformation sharing

Recent experiments have found that prompting people to think about accuracy reduces misinformation sharing intentions. The process by which this effect operates, however, remains unclear. Do accuracy

Measuring exposure to misinformation from political elites on Twitter

Misinformation can come directly from public figures and organizations (referred to here as “elites”). Here, we develop a tool for measuring Twitter users’ exposure to misinformation from elites

Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education: Public Perspectives, Sentiments, Attitudes, and Discourses

This study aims to understand the public’s perspectives, sentiments, attitudes, and discourses regarding the adoption, integration, and use of augmented reality and virtual reality in education and
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 157 REFERENCES

The Impact of Political Sophistication and Motivated Reasoning on Misinformation

ABSTRACT The debate around political misinformation is gaining increasing relevance among the general and academic audience. If a large body of work is devoted to understanding the mechanisms of

Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online.

It is found that the veracity of headlines has little effect on sharing intentions, despite having a large effect on judgments of accuracy, and that subtly shifting attention to accuracy increases the quality of news that people subsequently share.

Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News

It is shown that even a single exposure increases subsequent perceptions of accuracy, both within the same session and after a week, and that social media platforms help to incubate belief in blatantly false news stories and that tagging such stories as disputed is not an effective solution to this problem.

Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality

It is found that laypeople—on average—are quite good at distinguishing between lower- and higher-quality sources, and having algorithms up-rank content from trusted media outlets may be a promising approach for fighting the spread of misinformation on social media.

The science of fake news

Social and computer science research regarding belief in fake news and the mechanisms by which it spreads is discussed, focusing on unanswered scientific questions raised by the proliferation of its most recent, politically oriented incarnation.

An initial accuracy focus prevents illusory truth

Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines.

The data suggest that, in the context of fake news, deliberation facilitates accurate belief formation and not partisan bias.

Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.

The results suggest that belief in fake news may be driven, to some extent, by a general tendency to be overly accepting of weak claims, which may be partly responsible for the prevalence of epistemically suspect beliefs writ large.

Lazy, not biased: susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than bymotivated reasoning.Cognition

  • 2019
...