The Problem of Global Justice

  title={The Problem of Global Justice},
  author={Thomas Nagel},
  journal={Global Justice},
  • T. Nagel
  • Published 1 March 2005
  • Law
  • Global Justice
By comparison with the perplexing and undeveloped state of this subject, domestic political theory is very well understood, with multiple highly developed theories offering alternative solutions to well-defined problems. By contrast, concepts and theories of global justice are in the early stages of formation, and it is not clear what the main questions are, let alone the main possible answers. I believe that the need for workable ideas about the global or international case presents political… 
Global Justice and the Role of the State: A Critical survey
Reference to the state is ubiquitous in debates about global justice. Some authors see the state as central to the justification of principles of justice, and thereby reject their extension to the
Assembling Realistic Utopias: New Paths in the Global Justice Debate
Questions of global justice are among the most debated in contemporary political philosophy. It is possible to divide the debate into three main periods: the earliest is characterised by attempts,
John Rawls and distributive justice in a globalizing world
This paper critically examines John Rawls’ theory of global justice, particularly his rejection of global egalitarianism and subsequent proposal of the duty of assistance to poor countries. The aim
The value of global justice: Realism and moralism
It is a noticeable feature of the contemporary revival of interest in realist political thought that it has very much hesitated from exploring its implications for international political theory.
Global justice and the specter of leviathan
In a recent article on “The Problem of Global Justice,” Thomas Nagel argues that global socioeconomic justice presupposes a sovereign world state. I seek to undermine his arguments, which exemplify
Which supranational sovereignty? Criminal and socioeconomic justice compared
Abstract The idea that transnational dynamics challenge the regulatory capacity of the state has hardly ever received as much attention as in contemporary debates. Different voices denounce the
Global justice, sovereignty, and the problem of perspective
This article argues that a state-centered theory of global justice exhibits an epistemic problem of perspective, and that this worry exhibits a gendered character. Within a liberal domestic theory of
Global Egalitarianism and The State: On the Justice of Borders and Justice Beyond Borders
One of the most active areas of debate in liberal theories of global justice regards the proper application of domestic egalitarian theories of distributive justice, such as that posed by John Rawls,
Justice and Solidarity: The Contractarian Case against Global Justice
Charity begins at home, they say. But of course this does not mean that it ends there. It can and should extend way beyond home. The same might be said of respect for persons and their human rights.
The Moral Implications of the Global Basic Structure as a Subject of Justice
In this article, I discuss whether the theory of justice as fairness famously proposed by John Rawls can justify the implementation of global principles of socioeconomic justice, contrary to what


Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy
Liberalism has difficulty with the fact of state borders. Liberals are, on the one hand, committed to moral equality, so that the simple fact of humanity is sufficient to motivate a demand for equal
Rawls's Law of Peoples*
The Law of Peoples is John Rawls’s most comprehensive and systematic statement of his international thought.1 It is a remarkable and unusual essay. The normative scope is surprisingly broad for a
What Self-Governing Peoples Owe to One Another: Universalism, Diversity, and the “Law of Peoples”
  • S. Macedo
  • Philosophy
    Global Justice and the Bulwarks of Localism: Human Rights in Context
  • 2005
Do efforts to extend and enforce human rights unfairly impose Western liberal and individualistic values on societies whose varying traditions deserve greater respect? Are supposedly “universal”
Institutions and the Demands of Justice
Defendant la these contraire a celle de J. Rawls concernant les principes normatifs des institutions de la justice et de l'ethique de la personne, l'A. evalue les theses moniste et dualiste selon