Corpus ID: 17236206

The Pragma-Dialectical Aim of Argumentation and Argumentative Discourse : Elimination of a Difference of Opinion

@inproceedings{Lumer2012ThePA,
  title={The Pragma-Dialectical Aim of Argumentation and Argumentative Discourse : Elimination of a Difference of Opinion},
  author={Christoph Lumer},
  year={2012}
}
This contribution discusses some problems of Pragma-Dialectics and explains them by its consensualistic view of the function of argumentation and by its philosophical underpinnings. It is suggested that these problems can be overcome by relying on a better epistemology and on an epistemological theory of argumentation. On the one hand Pragma-Dialectics takes unqualified consensus as the aim of argumentation, which is problematic, (sect. 2) on the other it includes strong epistemological and… Expand

Figures from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 61 REFERENCES
Investigations and the Critical Discussion Model
I argue that although the pragma-dialectical analysis is said to focus on the process of argumentation aimed at resolving a difference of opinion, proponents of that theory hold that any actualExpand
The Epistemological Theory of Argument--How and Why?
The article outlines a general epistemological theory of argument: a theory that regards providingjustified belief as the principal aim of argumentation, and defends it instrumentalistically. AfterExpand
Argument, Inference and Dialectic, Collected Papers on Informal Logic with an Introduction by Hans V. Hansen
  • R. Pinto
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
  • Argumentation Library
  • 2001
TLDR
This chapter discusses Logic, Dialectic and the Practice of Rational Criticism, as well as Logic, Coherence and Psychology Revisited, as a whole, and its applications to Cognitive Science and the Future of RationalCriticism. Expand
Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective
Contents: Part I:Argumentation and Communication. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Standpoints and Differences of Opinion. Argumentation as a Complex Speech Act. Speech Acts in a Critical Discussion.Expand
The Epistemological Approach to Argumentation - A Map
This contribution gives an overview of the epistemological approach to argumentation. It explains what an 'epistemological approach to argumentation' is, and justifies this approach as being betterExpand
Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory : A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments
Contents: Preface. Introduction. Part I: Historical Backgrounds. Analytic, Dialectic and Rhetoric. Analysis of Fallacies, Controversy, and Discussion. Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric.Expand
The disputation — a special type of cooperative argumentative dialogue
This article consists of three parts, two introductory, in which the limits and the methods of analysis of dialogues are expounded, and the major part, in which the main features of a philosophicalExpand
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach
1. Introduction 2. The realm of argumentation studies 3. A model of a critical discussion 4. Relevance 5. Analysis as reconstruction 6. Rules for a critical discussion 7. Fallacies 8. A code ofExpand
Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument
Contents: Preface. Introduction. Part I: The Historical Context. Context: Argumentation as a Cultural Practice. Context: The Study of Argumentation. Paradigm Abandoned: Critique of Deductivism.Expand
Complex Argumentation in a Critical Discussion
In this paper, it is explained that a dialogical approach to complex argumentation can be fruitful for solving two important problems concerning the analysis of the argumentation structure. First,Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...