The Philosophical Foundations of Knowledge Management: Editors' Introduction

  title={The Philosophical Foundations of Knowledge Management: Editors' Introduction},
  author={J. C. Spender and Andreas Georg Scherer},
  pages={28 - 5}
Our work on this Special Issue began with a showcase symposium on the philosophical foundations of knowledge management (KM) at the AoM 2004 Meeting and was continued through KM tracks at the EURAM 2005 and EGOS 2005 Conferences. Our hope was to corral the variety of approaches in the KM literature and expose solid underpinnings against which the field's development might be gauged. We were unclear whether these would be axiomatic principles that defined the field or a set of professionally… 

Philosophical paradigms as the bases for knowledge management research and practice

This paper examined six philosophical paradigms, namely positivism, interpretivism, post-positivism, pragmatism, post modernism and critical realism. The paradigms serve as the bases for knowledge

From the Editor

Intelligence and context, knowledge, competence, and performance and results summarize the content of the papers presented to readers in this issue of the Journal. This is a very relevant series of

Organization Studies as Applied Science: The Generation and Use of Academic Knowledge about Organizations Introduction to the Special Issue

The relationship between theory and practice has been discussed in the social sciences for generations. Academics from management and organization studies regularly lament the divide between theory


Knowledge Management (KM) is the collection of processes that govern the creation, dissemination and utilization of knowledge. In form or another, knowledge management has been around for a very long

De‐Essentializing the Knowledge Intensive Firm: Reflections on Sceptical Research Going Against the Mainstream

This paper provides an updated summary and discussion of my 1993 JMS paper 'Organization as rhetoric: knowledge-intensive firms and the struggle with rhetoric', and relate this to my own and others'

A framework for critical evaluation of strategies for value creation within knowledge-driven organisations

This paper is about Knowledge Management, (KM), its rise, meaning, importance and why it is so complex. The explanation shows in brief why the rise of KM as a major concept is sweeping organisations

Beyond Knowledge Management: An Extended Model of Knowledge Governance

The authors propose a three-layer model adding a layer of “global†knowledge governance, which can reformulate the focus of knowledge governance research and practice in all layers.

Evolution of the Socio-cognitive Structure of Knowledge Management (1986–2015): An Author Co-citation Analysis

The evolution of the socio-cognitive structure of the field of knowledge management during the period 1986–2015 is described and nine classical authors are identified since they are highly co-cited in each sub-period, highlighting Ikujiro Nonaka as the most influential authors in the field.

The Resource-Based View: A Review and Assessment of Its Critiques

The resource-based view (RBV) of the firm has been around for over 20 years—during which time it has been both widely taken up and subjected to considerable criticism. The authors review and assess

Knowledge Orchestration for Sustained Competitive Advantage

Based on a review of established organizational knowledge theories, this article synthesizes and proposes a number of concepts which are proposed as an individual-driven way of interweaving knowledge flows in order to align knowledge potentials to a changing environment.



What is Organizational Knowledge

Organizational knowledge is much talked about but little understood. In this paper we set out to conceptualize organizational knowledge and explore its implications for knowledge management. We take

Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation

There is current interest in the competitive advantage that knowledge may provide for organizations and in the significance of knowledge workers, organ izational competencies and knowledge-intensive

Odd Couple: Making Sense of the Curious Concept of Knowledge Management

The idea of knowledge management draws currently much attention, both among practitioners and scholars. Advocates of the term argue that knowledge management points to a new set of phenomena and

Pluralist Epistemology and the Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm

Our focus is the differences between monist and pluralist epistemologies. We want to illustrate how the adoption of a pluralist epistemology can reshape our theorizing about firms, organizations and

Getting value from knowledge management

Purpose – Getting value from knowledge management (KM) means managing the way new knowledge is brought to bear on the business's practices, for value is added only through practice – not through

The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after

There are not many books that are genuine classics, and only a handful in business and management whose insights and ideas last for 50 years and more. This book is one of the very few 'must reads'

Towards a Reconciliation of the Theory Pluralism in Strategic Management - Incommensurability and the Constructivist Approach of the Erlangen School

Theory pluralism has become apparent in the field of strategic management. The traditional business policy framework is increasingly being subjected to criticism, and a variety of streams of research

Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing

Bridgin Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing - Much current work on organizational knowledge, intellectual capital, knowledge-creating

Some Remarks on the Problem of Incommensurability in Organization Studies

Organization studies have become differentiated and complex fields of research. It has become difficult for both the researcher and the practitioner to find appropriate answers to theoretical or

What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning

Firms are organizations that represent social knowledge of coordination and learning. But why should their boundaries demarcate quantitative shifts in the knowledge and capability of their members?