The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

@article{Page2021TheP2,
  title={The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.},
  author={Matthew J. Page and Joanne E. McKenzie and Patrick M. M. Bossuyt and Isabelle Boutron and Tammy C. Hoffmann and Cynthia D. Mulrow and Larissa Shamseer and Jennifer Marie Tetzlaff and Elie A. Akl and Sue E. Brennan and Roger Chou and Julie M. Glanville and Jeremy M. Grimshaw and Asbj{\o}rn Hr{\~o}bjartsson and Manoj Mathew Lalu and Tianjing Li and Elizabeth W. Loder and Evan Mayo-Wilson and Steve McDonald and Luke A. McGuinness and Lesley A Stewart and James Thomas and Andrea C. Tricco and Vivian A Welch and Penny F. Whiting and David Moher},
  journal={Journal of clinical epidemiology},
  year={2021}
}

Tables from this paper

PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram
TLDR
Some of the common questions about using the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram and tracking records through the systematic review process are reviewed.
Addressing Challenges When Applying GRADE to Public Health Guidelines: A Scoping Review Protocol and Pilot Analysis
TLDR
This protocol aims to determine how guideline authors using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach have addressed previously identified challenges related to public health.
Reporting characteristics of systematic review abstracts published in the proceedings of the SBPqO meeting
TLDR
The reporting characteristics of systematic review abstracts published in the proceedings of the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica meeting are satisfactory, however, there is room for improvement.
Interventions designed to improve vaccination uptake: Scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses - (version 1)
TLDR
The literature has a large number of relevant systematic reviews on interventions to increase vaccine uptake, with an increased publication rate over time, however, problems with the definitions and the current reporting of vaccine uptake evidence make it difficult to determine what works best in low-resource settings.
No Recommendation Is (at Least Presently) the Best Recommendation: An Updating Quality Appraisal of Recommendations on Screening for Scoliosis
  • M. Płaszewski
  • Medicine
    International journal of environmental research and public health
  • 2022
TLDR
This paper elaborates on the issue of the standards of development and reporting of current guidelines and recommendation statements, as well as on the methodological quality of the corresponding evidence syntheses.
PRISMA2020: an R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis
TLDR
A free-to-use, Open Source R package and web-based Shiny app to allow users to design PRISMA flow diagrams for their own systematic reviews and to facilitate strong science communication of the methods and results of systematic reviews by making use of interactivity.
Use of Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Pediatric Care: A Systematic Review
TLDR
This comprehensive review is the first to systematically search evidence around the use of patient-reported Experience Measures in pediatrics and can guide health administrators and researchers to use appropriate PREMs to implement patient and family-centered care inpediatrics.
Evidence From the Decade of Action for Road Safety: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Interventions in Low and Middle-Income Countries
TLDR
Based on the currently available evidence, legislation and enforcement interventions appear most impactful in LMICs, however, many interventions remain understudied and more holistic approaches capturing the complexity of road transport systems seem desirable.
Insufficient evidence to confirm benefits of custom partial knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
TLDR
Anecdotal evidence suggests that, compared to OTS implants, custom implants result in less bone–implant mismatch and that 78–91% of patients are either satisfied or very satisfied after custom partial knee arthroplasty.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 84 REFERENCES
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
TLDR
This paper presents the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where it is presented why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present examples from published reviews.
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement
TLDR
A reporting guideline is described, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015), which consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review.
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews
TLDR
The intent of PRISMA-S is to complement the PRISma Statement and its extensions by providing a checklist that could be used by interdisciplinary authors, editors, and peer reviewers to verify that each component of a search is completely reported and therefore reproducible.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration
TLDR
The meaning and rationale for each checklist item is explained, and an example of good reporting is included and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are included.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
TLDR
This Explanation and Elaboration document explains the meaning and rationale for each checklist item and includes an example of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct, enable readers to
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
TLDR
The pooled results of these studies suggest that reporting of many items in the PRISMA Statement is suboptimal, even in the 2382 SRs published after 2009, where nine items were adhered to by fewer than 67% of SRs.
...
...