The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure

@article{Kroenke2002ThePA,
  title={The PHQ-9: A new depression diagnostic and severity measure},
  author={Kurt Kroenke and Robert L. Spitzer},
  journal={Psychiatric Annals},
  year={2002},
  volume={32},
  pages={509-515}
}
and treatable mental disorders presenting in general medical as well as specialty settings. There are a number of case-finding instruments for detecting depression in primary care, ranging from 2 to 28 items.1,2 Typically these can be scored as continuous measures of depression severity and also have established cutpoints above which the probability of major depression is substantially increased. Scores on these various measures tend to be highly correlated3, with little evidence that one… Expand
The Use of the PHQ9 self-rating scale to assess depression within Primary Care.
TLDR
The PHQ-9 is effective in screening patients for depression as well as monitoring progress in a variety of situations, and is a cost-effective, efficient method of screening patients in primary care. Expand
Validation of the PHQ-9 in a psychiatric sample.
TLDR
This first comprehensive validation of the PHQ-9 in a large, psychiatric sample supported its use as a severity measure and as a measure of treatment outcome. Expand
PHQ-8 Days: a measurement option for DSM-5 Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) severity
TLDR
The days version of the PHZ-8 may be a valuable dimensional alternative to the traditional PHQ-8 by offering finer granularity of dimensionality (a score of 0 to 112). Expand
Identifying depression with the PHQ-2: A diagnostic meta-analysis.
TLDR
The generally lower sensitivity of the PHQ-2 at cut-off ≥3 than the original validation study suggests that ≥2 may be preferable if clinicians want to ensure that few cases of depression are missed, however, this may result in an unacceptably high false-positive rate. Expand
Assessing Depression Related Severity and Functional Impairment: The Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS)
TLDR
This study supports the reliability and validity of ODSIS in a non-western population, which can be interpreted as demonstrating cross-cultural validity. Expand
Managing Depression in Primary Care
TLDR
This chapter will focus on aspects of managing care of depression in primary care settings necessary, with up to 50% of depressed patients going unrecognized. Expand
The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review.
TLDR
ThePHQ-9, GAD-7 and PHQ-15 are brief well-validated measures for detecting and monitoring depression, anxiety and somatization. Expand
Dimensionality and the category of major depressive episode
TLDR
The surprise is that trained clinicians can do this reliably and that diagnostic interviews and questionnaires can emulate this process. Expand
Concordance between clinician-rated and patient reported outcome measures of depressive symptoms in treatment resistant depression.
TLDR
Findings generally supported acceptably high levels of agreement between patient and clinician ratings of baseline depression severity, and more work is needed to determine the extent to which PROs can improve outcomes in MBC for depression and, more specifically, TRD. Expand
The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population.
TLDR
The PHQ-8 is a useful depression measure for population-based studies, and either its diagnostic algorithm or a cutpoint > or = 10 can be used for defining current depression. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 38 REFERENCES
The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.
TLDR
In addition to making criteria-based diagnoses of depressive disorders, the PHQ-9 is also a reliable and valid measure of depression severity, which makes it a useful clinical and research tool. Expand
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change.
TLDR
The construction of a depression rating scale designed to be particularly sensitive to treatment effects is described, and its capacity to differentiate between responders and non-responders to antidepressant treatment was better than the HRS, indicating greater sensitivity to change. Expand
An inventory for measuring depression.
TLDR
The difficulties inherent in obtaining consistent and adequate diagnoses for the purposes of research and therapy have been pointed out and a wide variety of psychiatric rating scales have been developed. Expand
Telephone assessment of depression severity.
This report describes the adaptation of three common measures of depression severity, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, and selected items of theExpand
Case-Finding Instruments for Depression in Primary Care Settings
TLDR
The feasibility and operating characteristics of several case-finding instruments that have been used to detect depressive disorders in primary care settings are assessed to familiarize providers with the advantages and disadvantages of these instruments so that they can make informed decisions about incorporating them into practice. Expand
Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many.
TLDR
The two-question case-finding instrument is a useful measure for detecting depression in primary care and has similar test characteristics to other case- finding instruments and is less time-consuming. Expand
Discovering Depression in Medical Patients: Reasonable Expectations
TLDR
In this issue, Covinsky and colleagues report the results of a prospective cohort study of 572 hospitalized medical patients older than 70 years of age, finding that patients' overall condition was more likely to deteriorate and less likely to improve during hospitalization and after discharge. Expand
Is this patient clinically depressed?
TLDR
Multiple, practical questionnaires with reasonable performance characteristics are available to help clinicians identify and diagnose patients with major depression and can be made with high reliability. Expand
Performance of a Five-Item Mental Health Screening Test
TLDR
TheMHI-5 was as good as the MHI-18 and the GHQ-30, and better than the SSI-28, for detecting most significant DIS disorders, including major depression, affective disorders generally, and anxiety disorders. Expand
The Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Scale: reliability and validity
TLDR
The Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Scale was evaluated in 44 depressed inpatients; the scale exhibited construct validity (internal homogeneity) and concurrent validity relative to the Hamilton Depression Scale and the concepts of endogenous and nonendogenous depression. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...