The Newcomb Problem: An Unqualified Resolution

@article{Burgess2004TheNP,
  title={The Newcomb Problem: An Unqualified Resolution},
  author={Simon Burgess},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2004},
  volume={138},
  pages={261-287}
}
The Newcomb problem is analysed here as a type ofcommon cause problem. Inrelation to such problems, if you take the dominatedoption your expected outcomewill be good and if you take the dominant optionyour expected outcome will be notso good. As is explained, however, these arenot conventional conditional expectedoutcomes but `conditional evidence expectedoutcomes' and while in the deliberationprocess, the evidence on which they are based isonly hypothetical evidence.Conventional conditional… 
A typology of Newcomblike problems
This paper introduces a typology of Newcomblike problems—decision problems in which evidential decision theory and causal decision theory come apart. Such problems involve an evidential dependence
Demons, Deceivers And Liars: Newcomb’s Malin Génie
A fully adequate solution to Newcomb’s Problem (Nozick 1969) should reveal the source of its extraordinary elusiveness and persistent intractability. Recently, a few accounts have independently
Realizing Newcomb's Problem
Richard Jeffrey (1983, 23) said that Newcomb’s Problem may be seen “as a rock on which ... Bayesianism ... must founder” and the problem has been almost universally conceived as reconciling the
The One-boxing Intuition in Newcomb's Problem
In Newcomb's Problem, a lot of people choose the option of one-boxing. However, the equivalent choice is rarely made in other similar decision problems. This discrepancy needs explaining. In this
The lesson of Newcomb’s paradox
TLDR
It is shown that Newcomb’s paradox is time-reversal invariant; both the paradox and its resolution are unchanged if the algorithm makes its ‘prediction’ after you make your choice rather than before.
What Does Newcomb's Paradox Teach Us?
TLDR
It is shown that Newcomb's paradox is time-reversal invariant; both the paradox and its resolution are unchanged if the algorithm makes its 'prediction' after you make your choice rather than before, and the accuracy of the algorithm's prediction is irrelevant.
Newcomb’s problem and its conditional evidence: a common cause of confusion
TLDR
This paper argues that certain assumptions implicit in analyses of Newcomb's problem are subtly flawed, and draws attention to an important similarity between Newcomb’s problem and the toxin puzzle.
30 S ep 2 01 0 What does Newcomb ’ s Paradox Teach us ?
  • Philosophy
In Newcomb's paradox you choose to receive either the contents of a particular closed box, or the contents of both that closed box and another one. Before you choose though, an antagonist uses a
A robust resolution of Newcomb’s paradox
Newcomb’s problem is viewed as a dynamic game with an agent and a superior being as players. Depending on whether or not a risk-neutral agent’s confidence in the superior being, as measured by a
Newcomb's Problem as Cognitive Illusion
Newcomb’s Problem as Cognitive Illusion Peter Slezak (p.slezak@unsw.edu.au) Program in Cognitive Science School of History & Philosophy of Science University of New South Wales Sydney, NSW 2052,
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES
How to Probabilize a Newcomb Problem
“Dogmatism” (in a non-invidious sense) is an ancient term for the view that judgment is and ought to be a matter of assertion and denial, of belief (Greek, “dogma”) and disbelief. Probabilism is a
Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Expected Utility
We begin with a rough theory of rational decision-making. In the first place, rational decision-making involves conditional propositions: when a person weighs a major decision, it is rational for him
Papers in Ethics and Social Philosophy: Why ain'cha rich?
Some think that in (a suitable version of) Newcomb's problem, it is rational to take only one box. These one-boxers think of the situation as a choice between a million and a thousand. They are
Taking Chances: Essays on Rational Choice
Preface Part I. World Bayesianism: 1. Utility and the Bayesian paradigm Part II. Problems for Evidential Decision Theory: 2. Newcomblike problems 3. Not every prisoners' dilemma is a Newcomb problem
Causal decision theory
TLDR
My own version of causal decision theory is given, compared with versions offered by several other authors, and it is suggested that the versions have more in common than meets the eye.
The Foundations of Causal Decision Theory
TLDR
A chance to reconsider Prudential rationality as expected utility maximization as well as a representation theorem for causal decision theory.
Rational Decision and Causality
Preface Introduction 1. Bayesianism 2. The philosophical and psychological significance of Bayesian decision theory 3. Bayesian decision theories: some details 4. The counterexamples 5. Causal
Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty
The quantum formalism is a “measurement” formalism-a phenomenological formalism describing certain macroscopic regularities. We argue that it can be regarded, and best be understood, as arising from
The Logic of Decision
"[This book] proposes new foundations for the Bayesian principle of rational action, and goes on to develop a new logic of desirability and probabtility."-Frederic Schick, "Journal of Philosophy"
...
1
2
...