• DOI:10.1017/S0017383500015047
• Corpus ID: 162297822

The Negligent Historian: ‘Howlers’ in Livy

@article{Walsh1958TheNH,
  title={The Negligent Historian: ‘Howlers’ in Livy},
  author={P. G. Walsh},
  journal={Greece and Rome},
  year={1958},
  volume={5},
  pages={83 - 88}
}

• P. G. Walsh
• Published 1 March 1958
• History
• Greece and Rome

TheAb Vrbe Condita of Livy has been on many counts justly criticized as defective. The inaccuracy of his battle accounts, the vagueness of his geography, the occasional confusion caused by his failure to reconcile divergent accounts in his sources, the distortion of history through the excessive partiality shown to one or other of his ‘heroes’, and in general the highly rhetorical nature not only of his speeches but also of his dramatic narrations, which inevitably causes distortion—all these are formidable and justifiable criticisms. Some of these faults are, of course, attributable to the conventions of rhetorical history initiated by Isocrates, which dominated Roman historiography. Others have their cause in the fact that Livy was a book-scholar pure and simple; he seems not to have understood fully the tactics employed on the battlefield or the manifold devices used in sieges, nor to have visited many of the sites he describes. Now it is essential to expose these limitations, but in a sense it is unfair to condemn Livy for them, since they arise from human defects which would have required a heroic determination to repair.