The National Science Foundation and the Debate over Postwar Research Policy, 1942-1945: A Political Interpretation of Science--The Endless Frontier

  title={The National Science Foundation and the Debate over Postwar Research Policy, 1942-1945: A Political Interpretation of Science--The Endless Frontier},
  author={Daniel J. Kevles},
  pages={5 - 26}
  • D. Kevles
  • Published 1 August 1975
  • Political Science
  • Isis
TO DATE, the origins of Science-The Endless Frontier, the celebrated report issued in 1945 by Vannevar Bush and subsequently so influential in the shaping of the National Science Foundation, remain obscure behind the veil of memory. Bush, the director of the wartime Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD), later attributed the conception of the report to a casual conversation with President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who asked for it when Bush remarked that science might well languish… 

The Rockefeller Foundation and the post-WW2 transnational ecology of science policy: from solitary splendor in the inter-war era to a "me too" agenda in the 1950s.

  • P. Abir-Am
  • Political Science
    Centaurus; international magazine of the history of science and medicine
  • 2010
The experience of the Rockefeller Foundation, a key player in transnational science policy making during the inter-war era, is reflected upon, in order to reflect upon some of the issues confronting today’s science policy makers in the face of globalization.

The Counterproductive Management of Science in the Second World War: Vannevar Bush and the Office of Scientific Research and Development

  • L. Owens
  • Political Science
    Business History Review
  • 1994
Established to mobilize science during the Second World War, the Office of Scientific Research and Development (OSRD) and its director, Vannevar Bush, created new weapons as well as a new

Riding natural scientists' coattails onto the endless frontier: the SSRC and the quest for scientific legitimacy.

  • M. Solovey
  • Sociology
    Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences
  • 2004
It is proposed that the postwar National Science Foundation debate constituted a critical, transitional episode in American social science and partisan politics and has a deep historical significance for the social sciences, for American liberalism, and for the nation.

Peer Review and the Public Interest.

PROLOGUE: The unique contract between science and government that has existed in the United States since the end of World War II rests on the assumption that science must remain autonomous but that

The failure to formulate a national science policy: Israel's Scientific Council, 1948–1959

This article analyzes the failure to formulate a national science policy in Israel's early years by tracing the administrative genealogy of the Scientific Council (1948–59), which was established to

The State of Science in America

When Arthur Bestor called for the establishment of a national commission of “scientists and scholars” in 1952 to evaluate school curricula and, presumably, restore the subject-matter disciplines to

The Marxist Critique of Capitalist Science: A History in Three Movements?

I want to understand, as a participant and observer as well as a scholar, the history and prospects of the Marxist critique of capitalist science. This perspective underlay the political theories and

The Rise and Fall of the Science Advisor to the President of the United States

The president’s science advisor was formerly established in the days following the Soviet launch of Sputnik at the height of the Cold War, creating an impression of scientists at the center of



Postwar Planning; Bush, Science-The Endless Frontier, p. 2. 67Lyman Chalkley to Carroll L. Wilson

  • The Endless Frontier

Webb's arguments were based on a memo by Don K. Price. See "D. K. Price's Memorandum on the National Science Foundation

  • Budget, Ser. 39