The NCAA Cartel, Monopsonistic Restrictions, and Antitrust Policy

@article{Blair2017TheNC,
  title={The NCAA Cartel, Monopsonistic Restrictions, and Antitrust Policy},
  author={Roger D. Blair and Joseph R. Whitman},
  journal={The Antitrust Bulletin},
  year={2017},
  volume={62},
  pages={14 - 3}
}
NCAA members behave like a buyer cartel and use the bylaws of the NCAA to maintain their collusive agreement. We model the NCAA as a collusive monopsony and demonstrate the impact on compensation and employment for student athletes, as well as the consequences for social welfare and distribution of surplus. Then we identify specific NCAA bylaws that restrain competition among cartel members, such as limits on the number of athletic scholarships awarded, recruiting, player transfers, and… 

Figures from this paper

What can sports governing bodies do to comply with EU antitrust rules while maintaining territorial exclusivity?
Territorial exclusivity clauses are so ubiquitous and ingrained in the statutes and regulations of sports governing bodies (SGBs) that, until now, they seem to have gone largely unnoticed by members
Because It’s Worth It: Why Schools Violate NCAA Rules and the Impact of Getting Caught in Division I Basketball
The value of star college basketball players to their schools is examined using information known during the recruiting process (i.e., ex ante marginal revenue product). Under various regression
The NCAA Cartel and Antitrust Policy
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was originally founded to protect student athletes from the brutality of college football. The NCAA has established a number of prominent athletic

References

Few Athletes Benefit from Move to Multiyear Scholarships
  • CHRON. HIGHER EDUC