The Multicriterial Approach to the Problem of Demarcation

  title={The Multicriterial Approach to the Problem of Demarcation},
  author={Damian Fernandez-Beanato},
  journal={Journal for General Philosophy of Science},
The problem of demarcating science from nonscience remains unsolved. This article executes an analytical process of elimination of different demarcation proposals put forward since the professionalization of the philosophy of science, explaining why each of those proposals is unsatisfactory or incomplete. Then, it elaborates on how to execute an alternative multicriterial scientific demarcation project put forward by Mahner (2007, 521–522; 2013, 29–43). This project allows for the demarcation… 
Mario Bunge (1919–2020): Conjoining Philosophy of Science and Scientific Philosophy
The leitmotif of Mario Bunge’s work was that the philosophy of science should be informed by a comprehensive scientific philosophy, and vice versa; with both firmly rooted in realism and materialism.
The Universality of Science and Traditional Chinese Medicine
This chapter starts off by describing some of the theoretical assumptions on which TCM relies with the aim of casting light on whether they, alongside the clinical techniques TCM encompasses, can significantly be considered as a scientific theory comparable with that of conventional medicine.
Feng Shui and the Demarcation Project
The vast majority of well-informed philosophers of science and scientists who are clearly (uncontroversially) scientists are able to extensionally differentiate between almost all scientific and
Cicero's demarcation of science: A report of shared criteria.


The demarcation problem: a (belated) response to Laudan
Th e “demarcation problem,” the issue of how to separate science from pseudoscience, has been around since fall 1919—at least according to Karl Popper’s (1957) recollection of when he fi rst started
Loki's wager and Laudan's error: on genuine and territorial demarcation
Is the demarcation problem dead, or are the rumors of its demise greatly exaggerated? ! e answer depends on whom you ask. Some philosophers of science have voiced the opinion that the demarcation
Demarcating Science from Non-Science
The Rationality of Science
Modem Western culture understands itself as the foremost bearer of rationality, and this self-understanding rests upon the twin pillars of science and technology. From one perspective, that in which
Here be dragons: exploring the hinterland of science
This dissertation is an exploration of the hinterland of science and the strange ‘creatures’ dwelling there. In philosophical circles, the subject of pseudoscience has stirred relatively little
The structure of science : problems in the logic of scientific explanation
Recent controversies between analytic and historic-sociological approaches to the philosophy of science have not diminished its significance; in fact, it seems to me that the pragmatic component in
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
For centuries knowledge meant proven knowledge — proven either by the power of the intellect or by the evidence of the senses. Wisdom and intellectual integrity demanded that one must desist from
General philosophy of science : focal issues
Scientists use concepts and principles that are partly specific for their subject matter, but they also share part of them with colleagues working in different fields. Compare the biological notion
Defending Science -- Within Reason : Between Scientism and Cynicism
Sweeping in scope, penetrating in analysis, and generously illustrated with examples from the history of science, this new and original approach to familiar questions about scientific evidence and
Normative Naturalism
Normative naturalism is a view about the status of epistemology and philosophy of science; it is a meta-epistemology. It maintains that epistemology can both discharge its traditional normative role