The Microstructure of the “Flash Crash”: Flow Toxicity, Liquidity Crashes, and the Probability of Informed Trading

@article{Easley2011TheMO,
  title={The Microstructure of the “Flash Crash”: Flow Toxicity, Liquidity Crashes, and the Probability of Informed Trading},
  author={D. Easley and Marcos M. López de Prado and M. O'Hara},
  journal={The Journal of Portfolio Management},
  year={2011},
  volume={37},
  pages={118 - 128}
}
  • D. Easley, Marcos M. López de Prado, M. O'Hara
  • Published 2011
  • The Journal of Portfolio Management
  • The “flash crash” of May 6, 2010, was the second-largest point swing (1,010.14 points) and the biggest one-day point decline (998.5 points) in the history of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. For a few minutes, $1 trillion in market value vanished. In this article, the authors argue that the flash crash was the result of the new dynamics at play in the current market structure. They highlight the role played by order toxicity in affecting liquidity provision, and they show that a measure of… CONTINUE READING
    344 Citations

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
    Order Flow, Transaction Clock, and Normality of Asset Returns
    • 386
    PRICE, TRADE SIZE, AND INFORMATION IN SECURITIES MARKETS*
    • 2,011
    • PDF
    Proposed Rules
    • Merri Horn
    • 2004
    • 56
    • PDF
    Goldman Had 10 Days of Trading Losses in Q2.
    • Reuters, August
    • 2010
    High-Frequency Trading Technology.
    • TABB Group,
    • 2009
    NYSE Confirms Price Reporting Delays that Contributed to the Flash Crash.
    • 2010
    Speedy New Traders Make Waves Far from Wall St.
    • 2010