• Corpus ID: 14914215

The Majority Judgment Voting Procedure: A Critical Evaluation 1

@inproceedings{Felsenthal2008TheMJ,
  title={The Majority Judgment Voting Procedure: A Critical Evaluation 1},
  author={Dan S. Felsenthal and Mosh{\'e} Machover},
  year={2008}
}
We evaluate critically some of the properties of the Majority Judgement voting procedure recently proposed by Balinski and Laraki for the election of one out of two or more candidates. 
And the Loser Is… Plurality Voting
This paper reports on a vote for choosing the best voting rules that was organized among the participants of the Voting Procedures workshop in July, 2010. Among 18 voting rules, Approval Voting won
Judge: Don't Vote!
This article explains why the traditional model of the theory of social choice misrepresents reality, it cannot lead to acceptable methods of ranking and electing in any case, and a more realistic
On the Relevance of Theoretical Results to Voting System Choice
The first systematic comparisons of voting procedures appeared in the 1970’s. The journal Behavioral Science became a major forum for these early publications. Especially notable are the article by
Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki: Majority judgment: measuring, ranking, and electing
I review the recent book by Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki that critiques the traditional model of social choice based on ranking and proposes to replace it with a new model, majority judgment, that
Two Procedures Based on Ratings
While most social choice results pertain to ranking environments where the individuals submit their preference relations (and these only) to the balloting procedure, there are procedures that require
A note on comparing median evaluations in single-peaked domains
In one-dimensional, single-peaked domains, the paper compares the MaxMedian voting scheme of Basset and Persky (Public Choice 99: 299- 310) with majority rule and the utilitarian criterion. The
On choosing the alternative with the best median evaluation
The voting rule proposed by Basset and Persky (Public Choice 99:299–310, 1999) picks the alternative with the best median evaluation. This paper shows that this MaxMed principle is equivalent to the
Review of paradoxes afflicting various voting procedures where one out of m candidates (m ≥ 2) must be elected
The paper surveys 17 deterministic electoral procedures for selecting one out of two or more candidates, as well as the susceptibility of each of these procedures to various paradoxes. A detailed
A Linguistic Group Decision Making Method based on Distances
TLDR
The present paper provides an extension of MJ focused to reduce some of the drawbacks that have been detected in MJ, and proposes a new tie-breaking method also based on distances.
An Ordinal Multi-criteria Decision-Making Procedure in the Context of Uniform Qualitative Scales
In this contribution, we propose a multi-criteria decision-making procedure that has been devised in a purely ordinal way. Agents evaluate the alternatives regarding several criteria by assigning one
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 21 REFERENCES
Paradoxes of Preferential Voting
What can go wrong with sophisticated voting systems designed to remedy problems of simpler systems.
Voting as Veto
This Article introduces an alternate conception of voting as veto - based on "negative preferences" against a voter’s least preferred outcomes - that enriches voting theory and practice otherwise
Condorcet's Theory of Voting
  • H. Young
  • Economics
    American Political Science Review
  • 1988
Condcrcet's criterion states that an alternative that defeats every other by a simple majority is the socially optimal choice. Condorcet argued that if the object of voting is to determine the “best”
A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking
The impossibility theorems that abound in the theory of social choice show that there can be no satisfactory method for electing and ranking in the context of the traditional, 700-year-old model. A
Sequential voting by veto: Making the Mueller-Moulin algorithm more versatile
This paper shows that a relatively easy algorithm for computing the (unique) outcome of a sophisticated voting procedure called sequential voting by veto (SVV) applies to a more general situation
Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
It has been conjectured that no system of voting can preclude strategic voting-the securing by a voter of an outcome he prefers through misrepresentation of his preferences. In this paper, for all
Voting paradoxes and how to deal with them
TLDR
This chapter discusses the paradoxes of voting, including Borda's Paradox, Condorcet's paradox, and Schwartz's Paradox of Representation.
Approval voting
Approval voting has been offered by a number of formal theorists, notably Steven Brams and Peter Fishburn (1983), as a solution to problems occasioned by multicandidate elections. The formal
...
...