Corpus ID: 14914215

The Majority Judgment Voting Procedure: A Critical Evaluation 1

@inproceedings{Felsenthal2008TheMJ,
  title={The Majority Judgment Voting Procedure: A Critical Evaluation 1},
  author={Dan S. Felsenthal and Mosh{\'e} Machover},
  year={2008}
}
We evaluate critically some of the properties of the Majority Judgement voting procedure recently proposed by Balinski and Laraki for the election of one out of two or more candidates. 
Plurality Voting
This paper reports on a vote for choosing the best voting rules that was organized among the participants of the Voting Procedures workshop in July, 2010. Among 18 voting rules, Approval Voting wonExpand
And the Loser Is… Plurality Voting
This paper reports on a vote for choosing the best voting rules that was organized among the participants of the Voting Procedures workshop in July, 2010. Among 18 voting rules, Approval Voting wonExpand
Judge: Don't Vote!
This article explains why the traditional model of the theory of social choice misrepresents reality, it cannot lead to acceptable methods of ranking and electing in any case, and a more realisticExpand
On the Relevance of Theoretical Results to Voting System Choice
The first systematic comparisons of voting procedures appeared in the 1970’s. The journal Behavioral Science became a major forum for these early publications. Especially notable are the article byExpand
Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki: Majority judgment: measuring, ranking, and electing
I review the recent book by Michel Balinski and Rida Laraki that critiques the traditional model of social choice based on ranking and proposes to replace it with a new model, majority judgment, thatExpand
Majority judgment vs. majority rule
TLDR
It is shown that majority judgment is a practical method that accommodates any number of candidates, avoids both the Condorcet and Arrow paradoxes, and best resists strategic manipulation. Expand
A general scoring rule
TLDR
It is shown that a ranking rule of the following type axiomatically is characterized by a monotonicity condition and a multi-stage cancellation property. Expand
Two Procedures Based on Ratings
While most social choice results pertain to ranking environments where the individuals submit their preference relations (and these only) to the balloting procedure, there are procedures that requireExpand
A Distance-based Extension of the Majority Judgement Voting System
It is common knowledge that the political voting systems suer inconsistencies and paradoxes such that Arrow has shown in his well-known Impossibility Theorem. Recently Balinski and Laraki haveExpand
A note on comparing median evaluations in single-peaked domains
In one-dimensional, single-peaked domains, the paper compares the MaxMedian voting scheme of Basset and Persky (Public Choice 99: 299- 310) with majority rule and the utilitarian criterion. TheExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 21 REFERENCES
Paradoxes of Preferential Voting
What can go wrong with sophisticated voting systems designed to remedy problems of simpler systems.
Voting as Veto
This Article introduces an alternate conception of voting as veto - based on "negative preferences" against a voter’s least preferred outcomes - that enriches voting theory and practice otherwiseExpand
CONDORCET'S THEORY OF VOTING
Condcrcet's criterion states that an alternative that defeats every other by a simple majority is the socially optimal choice. Condorcet argued that if the object of voting is to determine theExpand
Condorcet's principle implies the no show paradox
In elections with variable (and potentially large) electorates, Brams and Fishburn's No Show Paradox arises when a voter is better off not voting than casting a sincere ballot.. Scoring methods doExpand
A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking
The impossibility theorems that abound in the theory of social choice show that there can be no satisfactory method for electing and ranking in the context of the traditional, 700-year-old model. AExpand
After two centuries, should condorcet's voting procedure be implemented?
This paper focuses on decision-making by voting in systems at all levels: the grass-root organization, the community, the nation and the international system. It examines several possible reasone whyExpand
Sequential voting by veto: Making the Mueller-Moulin algorithm more versatile
This paper shows that a relatively easy algorithm for computing the (unique) outcome of a sophisticated voting procedure called sequential voting by veto (SVV) applies to a more general situationExpand
Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
It has been conjectured that no system of voting can preclude strategic voting-the securing by a voter of an outcome he prefers through misrepresentation of his preferences. In this paper, for allExpand
APPROVAL VOTING
Approval voting has been offered by a number of formal theorists, notably Steven Brams and Peter Fishburn (1983), as a solution to problems occasioned by multicandidate elections. The formalExpand
Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
Consider a committee which must select one alternative from a set of three or more alternatives. Committee members each cast a ballot which the voting procedure counts. The voting procedure isExpand
...
1
2
3
...