The MAD Who Wasn't There: Soviet Reactions to the Late Cold War Nuclear Balance

@article{Green2017TheMW,
  title={The MAD Who Wasn't There: Soviet Reactions to the Late Cold War Nuclear Balance},
  author={Brendan Rittenhouse Green and Austin Long},
  journal={Security Studies},
  year={2017},
  volume={26},
  pages={606 - 641}
}
ABSTRACT What do nuclear weapons mean for the stability of the military balance? Mutually assured destruction (MAD) describes a stalemated balance of power where nuclear adversaries possess survivable retaliatory capabilities that ensure neither side can escape devastation in an all-out nuclear war. Moreover, the strong form of this empirical claim, which one might term “deep MAD,” is that mutual vulnerability is an inalterable and unchangeable condition. Drawing from recently declassified… 
22 Citations
Nuclear Blackmail and Nuclear Balance in the Baltic Region
Questions about the nuclear balance have resurfaced in Europe after a long hiatus. NATO members in the Baltic region especially worry that Russia might use nuclear weapons to gain a strategic
Nuclear Superiority Is What States Make of It
Does nuclear superiority offer political or military benefits? And, importantly, do these benefits accrue past the acquisition of a secure second-strike capability? International relations theory has
The Threat of Conventional Weapons to Nuclear Security: A New Reality for Deterrence
This paper explores the idea that developments in Conventional Prompt Global Strike (CPGS) systems degrade nuclear security. The United States is developing such weapons for niche conventional use on
Nuclear balance and the initiation of nuclear crises: Does superiority matter?
The nuclear competition school, an emerging theoretical perspective on the political effect of nuclear weapons, argues that a favorable nuclear balance can significantly reduce one’s expected costs
Parity, What is it Good For? Jimmy Carter and the Legitimation of Nuclear Strategy
In 1976, Americans elected Jimmy Carter on a promise of arms control and a reduced role for nuclear weapons in U.S. military strategy. While Carter remained committed to arms control, he ultimately
Conceal or Reveal? Managing Clandestine Military Capabilities in Peacetime Competition
International political outcomes are deeply shaped by the balance of power, but some military capabilities rely on secrecy to be effective. These “clandestine capabilities” pose problems for
Nuclear opportunism: A theory of how states use nuclear weapons in international politics
ABSTRACT How do states use nuclear weapons to achieve their goals in international politics? Nuclear weapons can influence state decisions about a range of strategic choices relating to military
Living with Uncertainty: Modeling China's Nuclear Survivability
  • Wu Riqiang
  • Political Science
    International Security
  • 2020
Many strategists argue that to deter a nuclear attack, states must be certain of their ability to retaliate after a nuclear first strike. China's nuclear posture of uncertain retaliation suggests an
Beyond Stability: The politics of conventional arms control in Europe
  • A. Graef
  • Political Science
    Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung
  • 2022
The conventional arms control architecture in Europe is falling apart. This article argues that classic arms control theory fails to explain this continuing process. I suggest that its underlying
Beyond the Rubicon: Command and Control in Regional Nuclear Powers
What factors explain the origins of command and control systems in emerging nuclear powers? Why do some states implement robust administrative, physical, and technical controls over their nuclear
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-6 OF 6 REFERENCES
China's Search for Assured Retaliation: The Evolution of Chinese Nuclear Strategy and Force Structure
After exploding its first nuclear device in 1964, China did not develop sufficient forces or doctrine to overcome its vulnerability to a first strike by the United States or the Soviet Union for more
Assuring Assured Retaliation: China's Nuclear Posture and U.S.-China Strategic Stability
Whether China will abandon its long-standing nuclear strategy of assured retaliation for a first-use posture will be a critical factor in future U.S.-China strategic stability. In the past decade,
Should the United States Reject MAD? Damage Limitation and U.S. Nuclear Strategy toward China
As China invests in its nuclear forces and U.S.-China relations become increasingly strained, questions of U.S. nuclear doctrine require greater attention. The key strategic nuclear question facing
The New Era of Counterforce: Technological Change and the Future of Nuclear Deterrence
Nuclear deterrence rests on the survivability of nuclear arsenals. For much of the nuclear age, “counterforce” disarming attacks—those aimed at eliminating an opponent's nuclear forces—were nearly
Soviet Nuclear Operations