The Legacy of President Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court

  title={The Legacy of President Obama in the U.S. Supreme Court},
  author={Isaac Unah and Ryan J. Williams},
  journal={Looking Back on President Barack Obama’s Legacy},
Isaac Unah and Ryan Williams evaluate the Obama administration and its relations with the US Supreme Court. With the advice and consent of the US Senate, President Obama appointed two justices for the Supreme Court and several lower federal court judges. This chapter examined Obama’s legacy in the Supreme Court and the critical cases (e.g., campaign finance, health care, voting rights, same-sex marriage) that faced the Roberts Court. They argue that Obama’s presidency was transformative for the… 



Advice and Dissent: The Struggle to Shape the Federal Judiciary

For better or worse, federal judges in the United States today are asked to resolve some of the nation's most important and contentious public policy issues. Although some hold onto the notion that

Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution

From Citizens United to its momentous rulings regarding Obamacare and gay marriage, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts has profoundly affected American life. Yet the court remains a

The Decline of Supreme Court Deference to the President

According to entrenched conventional wisdom, the president enjoys considerable advantages over other litigants in the Supreme Court. Because of the central role of the presidency in the U.S.

Standing To Appeal and Executive Non-Defense of Federal Law After the Marriage Cases

For supporters and opponents of same-sex marriage, the Supreme Court’s samesex marriage cases, United States v. Windsor and Hollingsworth v. Perry, must have felt anticlimactic. In December 2012,

The Supreme Court Bar: Legal Elites in the Washington Community

Who represents litigants in the Supreme Court of the United States? Kevin T. McGuire shows that the most sophisticated of them have the advantage of representation by an elite counsel made up of

Immigration in the Supreme Court, 2009-13: A New Era of Immigration Law Unexceptionalism

With appropriate caution necessitated by the lessons of recent history, this Article posits that the Supreme Court’s contemporary immigration decisions suggest that the plenary power doctrine, the

Delaying Justice(s): A Duration Analysis of Supreme Court Confirmations

Presidents traditionally have had great success when nominating justices to the Supreme Court, with confirmation being the norm and rejection being the rare exception. While the confirmation process

Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court

Does understanding how U.S. Supreme Court justices actually decide cases undermine the institutional legitimacy of the nation’s highest court? To the extent that ordinary people recognize that the

Explaining Executive Success in the U.S. Supreme Court

The solicitor general is widely believed to occupy a special status among the parties appearing in the U.S. Supreme Court. A broad array of theo retical advantages are thought to contribute to the

The Global Expansion of Judicial Power

In Russia, as the confrontation over the constitutional distribution of authority raged, Boris Yeltsin's economic program regularly wended its way in and out of the Constitutional Court until Yeltsin