The Landscape and Lexicon of Blinding in Randomized Trials

@article{Schulz2002TheLA,
  title={The Landscape and Lexicon of Blinding in Randomized Trials},
  author={K. Schulz and I. Chalmers and D. Altman},
  journal={Annals of Internal Medicine},
  year={2002},
  volume={136},
  pages={254-259}
}
Blinding in medical research possesses a rich history spanning a couple of centuries (1). Most researchers and readers grasp its meaning. Unfortunately, beyond that general understanding lies confusion. In addition to terms such as single blind and double blind meaning different things to different people, some steadfastly refuse to use the term blinding and insist instead on the term masking. Others confuse blinding with other methodologic precautions, such as concealment of allocation during… Expand
228 Citations
The blind leading the blind: use and misuse of blinding in randomized controlled trials.
Who knew? The misleading specificity of “double-blind” and what to do about it
Changes in beliefs identify unblinding in randomized controlled trials: a method to meet CONSORT guidelines.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES
Masking or blinding? An unscientific survey of mostly medical journal editors on the great debate.
  • T. Lang
  • Medicine
  • MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine
  • 2000
Blinding in clinical trials and other studies
The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
How well are randomized controlled trials reported in the dermatology literature?
...
1
2
3
4
5
...