The Kalam Cosmological Argument

@article{Craig2018TheKC,
  title={The Kalam Cosmological Argument},
  author={William Lane Craig},
  journal={Oxford Scholarship Online},
  year={2018}
}
  • W. Craig
  • Published 1 May 1982
  • Philosophy
  • Oxford Scholarship Online
A survey of recent philosophical literature on the kalam cosmological argument reveals that arguments for the finitude of the past and, hence, the beginning of the universe remain robust. Plantinga’s brief criticisms of Kant’s argument in his First Antinomy concerning time are shown not to be problematic for the kalam argument. This chapter addresses, one by one, the two premises of the kalam, focusing on their philosophical aspects. The notion of infinity, both actual and potential, is… 

On the Kalam Cosmological Argument

In this paper I present objections to the Kalam Cosmological Argument (KCA), a modernized formulation of the general class of cosmological arguments for the existence of god. Specifically, I focus on

A Defense of the Kalam Cosmological Argument and the B-Theory of Time

William Lane Craig is the most recognizable contemporary defender of the kalam cosmological argument. The argument, in its simplest form, is that (i) Whatever begins to exist has a cause of its

God, Causality, and the creation of the universe

The Kalam Cosmological Argument is perhaps the most solid and widely discus- sed argument for a caused creation of the universe. The usual objections to the argument mainly focus on the second

Craig’s Kalām Cosmological Argument

William Lane Craig, the contemporary Christian philosopher of religion, is the foremost advocate of the kalām cosmological argument. Although Craig’s kalām cosmological argument is not totally

On Non-Singular Space-times and the Beginning of the Universe

The most widely discussed argument for the existence of God is the so-called kalam cosmological argument, which originated in attempts on the part of certain ancient philosophers to rebut Aristotle’s

Cosmological Arguments

The book discusses the structure, content, and evaluation of cosmological arguments. The introductory chapter investigates features essential to cosmological arguments. Traditionally, cosmological

A New Kalam Argument

Modifying Benardete’s Grim Reaper paradox results in a new version of the Kalam cosmological argument: an argument for the necessary finitude of the past. The argument relies upon two crucial

The End of Eternity

A popular critique of the kalām cosmological argument is that one argument for its second premise (what I call the Impossible Formation Argument, IFA) illicitly assumes a finite starting point for

The Kalām Cosmological Argument and the Infinite God Objection

In this article, we evaluate various responses to a noteworthy objection, namely, the infinite God objection to the kalām cosmological argument. As regards this objection, the proponents of the kalām

The Kalām Cosmological Argument, the Big Bang, and Atheism

While there has been much work on cosmological arguments, novel objections will be presented against the modern day rendition of the Kalām cosmological argument as standardly articulated by William
...

References

SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES

ON THE KALAM COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT

This paper examines the Kalam cosmological argument, as put forward by William Craig. Craig infers the existence of a personal God from the supposedly finite past of the universe. The temporal

Endless Future: A Persistent Thorn in the Kalām Cosmological Argument

Abstract Wes Morriston contends that William Lane Craig's argument for the impossibility of a beginningless past results in an equally good argument for the impossibility of an endless future (or at

Graham Oppy on the Kalam Cosmological Argument

In conclusion, then, I think that the refutations proffered by Mackie of thekalām cosmological argument were all too quick and easy. Nor do I think Oppy has succeeded in rehabilitating those

Tristram Shandy's Last Page

  • R. Small
  • Philosophy
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1986
This note criticises an argument used by W. L. Craig against an actual infinity of past events. He argues that if Russell's use of the story of Tristram Shandy, who took a year to recount each day of

From the Grim Reaper Paradox to the Kalaam Argument

  • Blog post
  • 2009

Finitism and the Beginning of the Universe

  • Australasian Journal of Philosophy
  • 2014