The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts

  title={The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts},
  author={Ran Hirschl},
  journal={Annual Review of Political Science},
  • Ran Hirschl
  • Published 28 May 2008
  • Law, History
  • Annual Review of Political Science
In recent years, the judicialization of politics worldwide has expanded its scope to encompass what we may term “mega-politics”—matters of outright and utmost political significance that often define and divide whole polities. In this article, I explore the scope and nature of judicialization of this kind. I begin by identifying the characteristics of the judicialization of mega-politics and by surveying the main explanations for its emergence. I then illustrate the various forms and… 
Judicialization of politics or politicization of the judiciary? Considerations from recent events in Thailand
Abstract Courts are becoming major players in the political landscape of Southeast Asia. This paper seeks to examine the causes and consequences of this new trend with particular reference to
Judicialization of politics and vice versa: the transformation of constitutional discourse in Bangladesh
Transformation of constitutional discourse facilitated the judicialization of politics which is a political weapon to sustain the power of ruling party in shadow of legality in different countries at
  • F. Lima
  • Political Science, Law
  • 2020
The interactions between legal and political system has been strengthened in recent years, especially through judicial review, with the transference to Courts of themes that define and divide a
Democracy, judicialisation and the emergence of the Supreme Court as a policy-maker in Mexico
In 1994, four days after taking office, Ernesto Zedillo, the last president to govern Mexico emerging from the once hegemonic National Revolutionary Party, promoted a major redesign of the Supreme
The judicialisation of EMU politics: Resistance to the EU's new economic governance mechanisms at the domestic level
Courts are increasingly asked to deal with fundamental political disagreements in liberaldemocracies. Because of its political salience and the extent of its consequences, the crisis of the
Courts As Political Actors: Resistance to the Eu's New Economic Governance Mechanisms at the Domestic Level
Courts are increasingly considered to be political actors in liberal democracies as they deal with fundamental disagreements within a given polity. Because of its political salience and the extent of
A Tale of Two Courts: The Judicialization of Electoral Politics in Asia
This article examines the judicialization of electoral politics in Asia, an important but understudied trend, as demonstrated in Thailand and Indonesia. Though the constitutional courts in both have
In the past few decades, more than 150 countries and several supranational entities, ranging from South Africa to the European Union and covering approximately three-quarters of the world’s
The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America: Politics, Governance, and Judicial Design
In recent times there has been a dramatic change in the nature and scope of constitutional justice systems in the global south. New or reformed constitutions have proliferated, protecting social,
Judicial Politics versus Ordinary Politics: Is the Constitutional Judge Caught in the Middle?
Democratic politics are built upon the majority principle, but no contemporary constitutional democracy can live on that principle alone. To sustain key anti-majoritarian pillars of democracy, such


The New Constitutionalism and the Judicialization of Pure Politics Worldwide
Despite the increasing prevalence of the judicialization of politics - the ever-accelerating reliance on courts worldwide for addressing core moral predicaments, public policy questions, and
The Global Expansion of Judicial Power
In Russia, as the confrontation over the constitutional distribution of authority raged, Boris Yeltsin's economic program regularly wended its way in and out of the Constitutional Court until Yeltsin
The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government
What role do courts play in the establishment and maintenance of constitutional democracies? To address this question, we elaborate a model that draws on existing substantive literature and on
The judicialization of politics in Latin America
Introduction:The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America R.Sieder, L.Schjolden& A.Angell Judicialization of Politics: The Changing Political Role of the Judiciary in Mexico P.Domingo Changing
Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law
I INTRODUCTION Since World War II, there has been a profound shift in power away from legislatures and toward courts and other legal institutions around the world. This shift, which has been called
From the Countermajoritarian Difficulty to Juristocracy and the Political Construction of Judicial Power
Scholars in law, political science, and other disciplines are concentrating on two dimensions of the increased empowerment of courts throughout the world and the United States. The first set of
Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism
In countries and supranational entities around the globe, constitutional reform has transferred an unprecedented amount of power from representative institutions to judiciaries. The
Political Power and Judicial Power: Some Observations on Their Relation
This Essay summarizes and perhaps extends slightly some important recent work, mostly by political scientists, on the structural relation between the array of political power in a nation’s
Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History
Should the Supreme Court have the last word when it comes to interpreting the Constitution? The justices on the Supreme Court certainly seem to think so - and their critics say that this position
Coercing Virtue: The Worldwide Rule of Judges
In Coercing Virtue, leading social and legal commentator Judge Robert H. Bork focuses his gaze on one of the most powerful but overlooked forces in a long-running and now global culture war: judges.