The International Court of Justice Judgment in the Benin–Niger Border Dispute: The Interplay of Titles and ‘Effectivités’ under the Uti Possidetis Juris Principle

@article{Spadi2005TheIC,
  title={The International Court of Justice Judgment in the Benin–Niger Border Dispute: The Interplay of Titles and ‘Effectivit{\'e}s’ under the Uti Possidetis Juris Principle},
  author={Fabio Spadi},
  journal={Leiden Journal of International Law},
  year={2005},
  volume={18},
  pages={777 - 794}
}
  • F. Spadi
  • Published 1 December 2005
  • Law
  • Leiden Journal of International Law
The chamber of the ICJ entrusted with solving the Benin–Niger dispute based its judgment on the colonial heritage left to the two countries at the time of their independence, as prescribed by the uti possidetis juris principle. The dispute actually stemmed from that heritage: the chamber's role was to interpret and clarify it. But while the uti possidetis juris principle underlines border stability, features such as river boundaries, because of their intrinsic movable nature, can put this… 
3 Citations
Where rivers and boundaries meet: building the international river boundaries database
Rivers have been a popular choice for international boundary-makers throughout history for a variety of reasons. However, defining a jurisdictional limit in a dynamic natural feature continues to
Uluslararası Hukukta Köprüler: Sınırlar ve Diğer Hususlar
Nehirler ve bogazlar uzerinde iki yakayi birlestirmek icin her zaman bu belirtilen cografi kesitlerde kopruler insa edilmistir. Uluslararasi hukuk bunlar genelde ilgilenmez. Fakat, eger kiyilar
Decolonization and Boundary Disputes in West Africa
  • D. Mandell
  • Global Encyclopedia of Territorial Rights
  • 2021